Curriculum
Course: What is Crypto
Login
Video lesson

Bitcoin Path To $10 Million

BTC Path to $1 Million: Bitcoin Challenges the Traditional Financial System

Central Banks vs. Decentralization: The Battle for Financial Control

Imagine a world where a single Bitcoin could be worth $1 million. Sounds fantastical? According to some, this future might not be as far-fetched as it seems. The idea of Bitcoin reaching such astronomical heights has become a topic of heated debate, not just among crypto enthusiasts but within central banking circles. The European Central Bank (ECB) recently released a paper discussing the potential “redistributive effects” of Bitcoin, claiming that its rise could impoverish those outside the crypto space, because they are citing how they see Bitcoin potentially hitting US$10M per Bitcoin!

In this lesson, we’ll explore why traditional financial institutions like the ECB are increasingly worried about Bitcoin’s trajectory, what it means for the future of money, and how these concepts connect with the broader world of cryptocurrency and blockchain. As we unpack the arguments presented, we’ll also draw parallels to decentralized finance (DeFi) and its potential to reshape global markets. Welcome to the future of finance, where Bitcoin stands as both a disruptor and a lifeline.

Wealth Redistribution

The central argument of this discussion centers on Bitcoin’s potential to reach a price of $10 million per coin, as outlined in the ECB’s analysis of its long-term effects. According to the paper, the rise of Bitcoin is seen as a threat, potentially redistributing wealth from latecomers or non-holders to early adopters. The ECB is particularly concerned with the idea that Bitcoin’s success could “impoverish” those who are not involved in its ecosystem.

Key points of the analysis include:

  • Inflation vs. Austerity: The EU faces a choice between austerity (cutting government spending) and inflating their way out of debt. The ECB, however, seems more inclined toward the latter.
  • Bitcoin’s Fixed Supply: Unlike fiat currencies, Bitcoin’s supply is capped at 21 million coins, making it immune to inflationary policies.
  • Wealth Redistribution: Early Bitcoin holders are portrayed as benefitting from the system at the expense of those entering the market late.

The ECB paper paints a dire picture of Bitcoin’s rise, suggesting that it could undermine traditional financial systems and create inequities. But is that truly the case? Let’s dive deeper into the implications of these arguments.

Critical Analysis

Strengths of the Video’s Arguments

  1. Bitcoin as a Hedge Against Inflation
    One of the strongest arguments presented is that Bitcoin, with its limited supply, provides a hedge against inflation—something central banks cannot claim with fiat currencies. Inflation is often described as a “silent thief,” eroding the value of money over time. Bitcoin, by contrast, has a fixed supply, meaning that no central authority can print more to devalue its worth. Countries like Venezuela and Zimbabwe, which have experienced hyperinflation, have seen their citizens turn to Bitcoin as a way to preserve wealth. This point is particularly compelling because it highlights Bitcoin’s role as a refuge in failing fiat systems.

  2. Bitcoin’s Decentralization vs. Centralized Fiat
    Bitcoin’s decentralized nature is another strong point. Unlike fiat currencies, which are controlled by central banks and governments, Bitcoin operates on a peer-to-peer network, immune to political interference. The ECB’s paper implicitly acknowledges this, even as it criticizes Bitcoin’s redistributive effects. Decentralization is a revolutionary concept in finance because it puts control back into the hands of the individual, rather than a centralized institution. The contrast between centralized fiat systems and decentralized cryptocurrencies couldn’t be clearer.

  3. Wealth Redistribution Through Innovation
    The lesson makes a strong case that wealth redistribution isn’t inherently a bad thing when it stems from innovation. Just as early investors in technologies like the internet or mobile phones saw outsized returns, early Bitcoin adopters are now benefitting from their foresight. Wealth redistribution in this context is simply the reward for recognizing the value of a transformative technology. Historical examples like Bill Gates with Microsoft and Jeff Bezos with Amazon reinforce the idea that those who adopt early almost always benefit disproportionately.

Potential Weaknesses in the Argument

  1. Volatility and Risk
    One aspect the lesson doesn’t fully address is the volatility of Bitcoin. While the focus is on its potential to reach $1-10 million, Bitcoin’s price is notoriously volatile. This volatility can be nerve-wracking for investors, especially those new to the space. While the long-term potential of Bitcoin is promising, its short-term price swings can be severe, making it a risky asset for those unprepared to weather the storm. The ECB’s concerns about Bitcoin impoverishing non-holders could be reframed to highlight the risks of entering a volatile market without understanding the complexities involved.

  2. Inequality Within the Bitcoin Ecosystem
    The argument that early Bitcoin adopters benefit at the expense of latecomers touches on an important issue—inequality within the Bitcoin ecosystem. While Bitcoin promotes financial freedom and sovereignty, the fact remains that those who bought in early are at a significant advantage. The video frames this as a natural outcome of technological adoption, but it doesn’t fully explore the potential long-term implications of this wealth gap within the crypto community itself.

  3. Overlooked Role of Regulation
    The lesson mentions potential legislation against Bitcoin but doesn’t delve deeply into the role regulation could play in shaping Bitcoin’s future. Governments around the world are grappling with how to regulate cryptocurrencies, and their decisions could have significant implications for Bitcoin’s price and adoption. While decentralization is a key feature of Bitcoin, regulatory actions could influence its accessibility and legality in certain regions. The lesson could benefit from a more nuanced discussion on how regulation might interact with Bitcoin’s trajectory.

Connections to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain

Bitcoin’s potential rise to $1-10 million isn’t just about its price—it’s about what it represents for the future of finance. The concepts discussed in the lesson have clear parallels in the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.

Bitcoin’s Role in Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

Decentralized finance (DeFi) is one of the most exciting developments in the crypto space, offering financial services without intermediaries like banks. Many of the challenges highlighted in the video, such as inflation and wealth redistribution, are directly addressed by DeFi protocols. For example, lending platforms like Aave or Compound allow users to earn interest on their crypto holdings, much like a traditional savings account—but without the middleman. Bitcoin’s fixed supply and decentralized nature make it a perfect asset for integration into these systems, where transparency and trust are paramount.

Innovative Blockchain Solutions

In addition to DeFi, blockchain technology is offering solutions to many problems traditional finance can’t solve. For instance, Bitcoin’s decentralization ensures that no single entity can manipulate the system, which stands in stark contrast to the fiat world, where central banks have the power to print money. Projects like Ethereum are pushing the boundaries even further by allowing developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) that could disrupt industries ranging from finance to healthcare. These innovations build on the core principles discussed in the lesson, offering real-world applications of decentralization.

Broader Implications and Future Outlook

Bitcoin’s trajectory is just one aspect of a larger financial revolution. As central banks continue to print money and struggle with debt, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are becoming increasingly attractive alternatives for both individuals and institutions. The rise of DeFi is another indication that the financial world is undergoing a profound transformation. Traditional systems, built on centralized control and inflationary policies, are being challenged by decentralized networks that offer transparency, security, and sovereignty.

Looking forward, we can expect several key developments:

  • Increased Institutional Adoption: As Bitcoin continues to prove itself as a store of value, more institutions will likely invest in it. We’re already seeing this with companies like MicroStrategy and Tesla.
  • Global Currency Competition: Countries experiencing hyperinflation may increasingly turn to Bitcoin as a reserve currency, challenging the dominance of traditional fiat systems.
  • Regulatory Battles: Governments will continue to grapple with how to regulate cryptocurrencies, but decentralized networks may make it difficult for them to exert full control.

Personal Commentary and Insights

From my experience in the crypto space, it’s clear that Bitcoin represents more than just an asset—it’s a movement toward financial freedom. I’ve seen firsthand how Bitcoin can protect people from the devastating effects of hyperinflation and currency devaluation. While the road to $10 million may seem improbable to some, the underlying forces driving Bitcoin’s rise are real: inflationary pressures, distrust in central banks, and the increasing adoption of decentralized technologies.

But it’s also important to recognize the risks. Bitcoin’s volatility makes it a challenging investment for those unfamiliar with its ups and downs. However, for those who can stomach the volatility, the potential rewards are enormous. Bitcoin isn’t just a speculative asset—it’s a hedge against a failing financial system.

Conclusion

The lesson of Bitcoin’s rise to $1-10 million offers a glimpse into the future of finance. As central banks struggle with inflation and debt, Bitcoin’s decentralized and deflationary nature stands as a powerful alternative. While there are risks and challenges, the potential for Bitcoin to reshape the financial landscape is undeniable. For those new to the space, understanding these dynamics is crucial to navigating the world of cryptocurrencies.

This article has merely scratched the surface of the complex world of Bitcoin and decentralized finance. To dive deeper into these concepts and learn how to apply them to your financial strategy, continue with the next lesson in the Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training program. The future of finance awaits—are you ready?

Quotes:

  1. “Bitcoin’s fixed supply makes it immune to inflation—a refuge in a world of endlessly printed fiat.”
  2. “Early Bitcoin adopters didn’t just get lucky; they recognized the potential of a technology that could transform the global financial system.”
  3. “As central banks print more money, Bitcoin stands as a decentralized lifeline for those looking to preserve their wealth.”

 

 

 

Bitcoin: The Path to $1 Million – A Financial Revolution Unfolds

Welcome to the world of financial evolution, where cryptocurrencies are rewriting the rules of wealth creation. In today’s lesson, we explore Bitcoin’s trajectory toward an astonishing $10 million per coin, and how central banks, like the European Central Bank (ECB), are reacting to its potential. This lesson will connect traditional financial principles with the dynamic cryptocurrency ecosystem, focusing on the implications of fiat money, inflation, and wealth redistribution. Whether you’re new to the crypto world or deepening your understanding, we’ll uncover the forces driving Bitcoin’s price and how you can position yourself to benefit from this revolution.

Core Concepts

Understanding these key concepts will provide a foundation for grasping how the traditional financial world relates to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies:

  1. Fiat Money
    Traditional Finance: Currency issued by a government that has no intrinsic value and is not backed by a physical commodity (like gold). Its value is based on trust in the government.
    Crypto World: Fiat is often seen as a system vulnerable to inflation and manipulation by central authorities, in contrast to Bitcoin, which is decentralized and limited in supply.
    Why It’s Crucial: As inflation erodes fiat value, Bitcoin offers a hedge, providing a store of value immune to government interference.

  2. Inflation
    Traditional Finance: The rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services rises, reducing purchasing power.
    Crypto World: Bitcoin’s fixed supply (21 million coins) makes it resistant to inflation, offering an alternative to currencies like the euro or dollar that can be devalued through money printing.
    Why It’s Crucial: As governments print more money, Bitcoin’s scarcity becomes increasingly attractive.

  3. Wealth Redistribution
    Traditional Finance: Redistribution typically refers to the reallocation of wealth via taxation or government policy.
    Crypto World: Bitcoin redistributes wealth by rewarding early adopters and creating new forms of wealth outside traditional financial systems.
    Why It’s Crucial: Understanding this dynamic helps you grasp how Bitcoin’s rise impacts both holders and non-holders.

  4. Austerity
    Traditional Finance: A policy of reducing government deficits through spending cuts and tax increases.
    Crypto World: Austerity often fails, leading to inflationary policies, which can drive demand for decentralized assets like Bitcoin.
    Why It’s Crucial: As countries struggle with debt, Bitcoin’s non-inflationary nature offers a powerful alternative.

  5. Bitcoin Positive Scenario
    Traditional Finance: A speculative scenario where Bitcoin’s value rises drastically, affecting economies and traditional investors.
    Crypto World: A bullish outlook embraced by Bitcoiners, where Bitcoin’s price soars due to fiat failures, inflation, and increased adoption.
    Why It’s Crucial: Recognizing this scenario prepares you to take advantage of market trends before they fully materialize.

Key Sections

1. The Economic Context: Why the ECB Is Worried

  • Key Points:

    • The EU’s declining economic state due to high taxes, regulatory burdens, unfunded pensions, and energy crises.
    • Governments face two choices: austerity or inflation. The latter is the likely path.
    • Bitcoin’s rise is seen as a threat to traditional financial systems.
  • Explanation:
    Europe’s economic challenges, driven by decades of poor policy, have reached a breaking point. Central banks like the ECB have no option but to inflate their way out of debt, leading to money printing on an unprecedented scale. This inflationary spiral erodes the value of fiat currencies, making assets like Bitcoin a lifeline for those looking to preserve wealth.

  • Crypto Connection:
    Bitcoin was designed to thrive in environments where fiat currency is devalued. As central banks print more money, the scarcity of Bitcoin becomes its most attractive feature. The ECB may see Bitcoin as a threat, but for crypto enthusiasts, it’s a lifeboat in turbulent financial seas.

2. Inflation: The Silent Thief of Wealth

  • Key Points:

    • Inflation reduces purchasing power.
    • Governments inflate to manage debt.
    • Bitcoin’s limited supply protects against inflation.
  • Explanation:
    Inflation acts as a stealth tax, slowly eroding the purchasing power of your money. While central banks use inflation as a tool to manage debt, the real cost is borne by the people. Bitcoin’s appeal lies in its fixed supply—there will only ever be 21 million coins, making it immune to inflation.

  • Crypto Connection:
    While fiat currencies can be printed at will, Bitcoin’s deflationary design makes it a store of value in times of economic uncertainty. Countries experiencing hyperinflation, like Venezuela, have seen citizens flock to Bitcoin as a stable alternative.

3. Wealth Redistribution and Bitcoin: A New Paradigm

  • Key Points:

    • Early Bitcoin adopters benefit significantly.
    • The ECB views Bitcoin as redistributive in a negative way.
    • Redistribution in crypto is a natural outcome of innovation.
  • Explanation:
    The ECB argues that Bitcoin enriches early holders at the expense of latecomers. However, this criticism ignores the historical truth: those who adopt transformative technologies early often reap the rewards. From Henry Ford to Bill Gates, pioneers have always been the ones to benefit most from their foresight and risk-taking.

  • Crypto Connection:
    Bitcoin’s rise is no different from past technological revolutions. Just as early investors in the internet or mobile technology saw massive gains, early Bitcoin holders are now benefiting from their willingness to take risks in a new frontier.

4. Austerity vs. Inflation: The Dilemma of Governments

  • Key Points:

    • Austerity is politically unpopular and rarely successful.
    • Inflation is the easier, but more destructive, path.
    • Bitcoin serves as an alternative to both approaches.
  • Explanation:
    Governments face a difficult choice between tightening their belts (austerity) or printing more money (inflation). History shows that austerity rarely works, as it creates social unrest and political backlash. Inflation, while easier, leads to long-term economic damage. Bitcoin offers an escape from this vicious cycle—a decentralized currency that cannot be inflated at will.

  • Crypto Connection:
    Bitcoin’s value lies in its independence from government policy. As fiat currencies are printed into oblivion, Bitcoin remains a stable store of value, immune to the whims of central banks.

5. Bitcoin: A Hedge Against Fiat Failures

  • Key Points:

    • Bitcoin’s decentralized nature contrasts with fiat’s centralized control.
    • Bitcoin offers financial sovereignty.
    • Central banks cannot stop Bitcoin’s rise.
  • Explanation:
    Bitcoin is a voluntary, decentralized system that provides financial sovereignty to its users. In contrast to fiat money, which is controlled by central authorities and can be printed endlessly, Bitcoin is a finite resource. The ECB’s concerns about Bitcoin rising to $10 million are rooted in fear—fear that Bitcoin will undermine their control over the financial system.

  • Crypto Connection:
    As more people recognize Bitcoin’s potential as a hedge against failing fiat systems, its adoption will only grow. Central banks can attempt to legislate against it, but Bitcoin’s decentralized structure makes it impossible to stop.

Real-World Applications

  • Historical Context: Central banks have repeatedly tried to control inflation with limited success. In contrast, Bitcoin’s algorithmically determined supply creates a deflationary dynamic, making it an appealing alternative for those looking to preserve their wealth.

  • Example: In 2021, countries like Turkey saw a surge in Bitcoin adoption as the Turkish lira devalued rapidly. Bitcoin became a safe haven, much like gold has traditionally been.

Challenges and Solutions

  • Challenge: The volatility of Bitcoin’s price can be nerve-wracking for new investors.
  • Solution: Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is a strategy where investors purchase Bitcoin at regular intervals, reducing the impact of short-term price swings.

Key Takeaways

  1. Bitcoin as a Hedge: In an inflationary world, Bitcoin offers a safe harbor due to its limited supply.
  2. Wealth Redistribution: Early adopters benefit, but Bitcoin also allows latecomers to participate in a global financial revolution.
  3. Inflationary Pressures: As central banks print more money, Bitcoin’s scarcity becomes more valuable.
  4. Fiat vs. Crypto: Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it a direct challenge to fiat money.
  5. Volatility Management: Strategies like dollar-cost averaging can help mitigate risk in volatile markets.

Discussion Questions

  1. How does inflation in traditional finance compare to Bitcoin’s deflationary model?
  2. Is wealth redistribution a negative aspect of Bitcoin, or is it a natural part of technological adoption?
  3. What are the long-term implications of central banks continuing to print money?
  4. How does Bitcoin’s fixed supply impact its role as a store of value compared to gold?
  5. Could central banks ever adopt Bitcoin, or is it fundamentally opposed to their control?

Glossary

  • Fiat Money: Government-issued currency not backed by a physical commodity.
  • Inflation: The decrease in purchasing power of money.
  • Wealth Redistribution: The reallocation of wealth, often seen negatively by central banks in the context of Bitcoin.

  • Austerity: Government policies focused on reducing debt by cutting spending.
  • Bitcoin Positive Scenario: A situation where Bitcoin’s price rises significantly, impacting traditional financial systems.

By mastering these concepts, you’re taking a critical step in the Crypto is FIRE (CFIRE) training program. Stay curious and keep learning—the world of crypto is evolving fast, and those who understand it will be the ones who benefit most. Ready for the next lesson? Let’s keep going!

 

 

Today I want to talk about Bitcoin going to  $10 million per coin. The current attack that the ECB, the European Central Bank, is making on Bitcoin, as well as  this paper called The Distributional Consequences of Bitcoin.
 The context, the overall economic and social context  for this paper is that the EU itself is in an accelerating state of decline due to decades of  poor policy decisions. That includes a very high tax regime, ridiculous regulatory burden for  individuals and for businesses, absolutely terrible energy policy, an unfunded pension crisis,  a sovereign debt crisis,  among other things. Now there are only two paths out of this mess.
 There’s austerity,  and then there is inflating your way out of the debt. The problem with austerity and belt  tightening is they never work to solve political problems because it really is never the political  will for them.
 And if you’re a politician who tries austerity, in other words, cutting government spending, firing government workers, shrinking the impact of the government on the economy,  if you’re a politician who tries to do this and sort of cut the budget deficits, you’re going to  be voted out the next cycle, and then your successor will end up going the inflationary route  instead. So we know that the EU will choose inflation. We know because of that,  that the ECB is getting ready to rev up the money printers as we speak.
 And they clearly understand  that the result of this will be a spectacular rise in Bitcoin’s price, what the authors of this  paper glumly call a quote unquote Bitcoin positive scenario, though they don’t sound very positive  about it. It turns out that the  central bankers are even more bullish on Bitcoin than most Bitcoiners.
 So if we take a look inside  this paper, we can see this prediction. While the current market value of a Bitcoin is in the range  of $50,000 to $60,000, it could be argued that any price for Bitcoin is equally plausible,  that any price for Bitcoin is equally plausible, including $10 million per coin or more. Now,  this is the central thesis of this paper that we’re going to be talking about today.
 If the price of Bitcoin rises for good, in other words, if the price of Bitcoin goes up and stays up,  if the price of Bitcoin rises for good, the existence of Bitcoin impoverishes both non-holders  and latecomers. What a ridiculous  statement that we’re going to be talking about. While previous discussions on the redistributive  effects of Bitcoin assume that badly timed trading was a necessary condition for losses,  this paper shows that neither poor timing of trades nor holding Bitcoin at all are necessary  for impoverishment under a Bitcoin positive scenario.
 So this is really the paper  central argument that early holders of Bitcoin are impoverishing people who bought later. Now,  how many years back does this extend? Am I personally partially responsible for impoverishing  other people because I first bought five-figure Bitcoin in late 2019 and early 2020. For example,  I bought some Bitcoin for around $15,000 and then rode it all the way up to $69,000 and then rode it  all the way back down to $15,000, $16,000 and now back up to $67,000 or wherever we are now.
 I also bought a lot of Bitcoin in the $60,000s and was underwater on it for years and have only  recently gotten back in the money on it.  Now, was that stealing from people or did the stealing begin the moment that my position  finally got back in the money? If you’re enjoying this video so far, I just ask you to help to  support this channel’s mission. Hit the subscribe button.
 That really does help with the YouTube  algorithm and helps to support this channel. Leave a like, leave a comment, question,  suggestion for a future video or response to this  video in the comment section below. Share this video with a friend or family member. You can  also leave a tip by clicking the thanks button and you can also join to get a couple extra free  videos if you click the join button. So here’s the real question that I’m asking the ECB.
 Did I hurt anyone by buying Bitcoin? Did I inflict violence on anyone by buying Bitcoin?  What actually happened was that many of my old friends, old colleagues, and extended family  laughed at me and told me that I was obsessed with garbage and had lost my mind. So if anything,  the violence and the abuse really went the other direction.
 When I bought Bitcoin, did I steal from  anyone? To buy Bitcoin, I used fiat money that I’d earned honestly and paid a ton of taxes on and had already suffered a lot of loss of purchasing power, in other words, monetary  debasement on. Am I a bad person because I shielded my family from central bank money printing  that was being used to help my government fund its deficit spending and buy bombs to drop on  women and children all around the world? Was this the bad thing that I did?  Am I a bad person because I want to opt out of a system that supports the military-industrial complex and sex trafficking for our so-called elites? If I bought shares of BlackRock or
 Goldman Sachs or other big banks at the same time and made money on them, was I thereby  impoverishing those who didn’t own any BlackRock or Goldman Sachs shares for the past four years? And to be very clear, I did not own either of these, nor would I want to.  Or does this critique from the ECB apply only to those assets that bankers don’t like?  If I make money on banking stocks, the central bankers don’t get mad about that.
 But if my  purchasing power increases by holding Bitcoin, that seems to be the thing that they don’t like.  For example, is Bill Gates a bad person because he owned Microsoft shares before anyone else? If not, why not? Here’s the  thing.
 When a new technology comes along, those who jump on the bandwagon earlier than everyone else  almost always benefit economically more than people who don’t. People like Bill Gates, Jeff  Bezos, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and then going back to  another generation, Henry Ford, J.D. Rockefeller, etc. I guess it’s only a bad thing if you’re a  Marxist or a central banker who doesn’t create anything of value for the world, because these  are all people. These were all pioneers in their respective industries.
 They made a lot of money  as a result. The question is, is the ECB against basic entrepreneurship and investment like this as well?  The bankers are the ones who are actually responsible for impoverishing people  because they’re the ones who’ve been telling people for the past 15 years that Bitcoin is a bubble,  it’s a scam, it’s a Ponzi, it uses too much energy.
 They’ve been doing this for a very long time,  while at the same time printing ungodly amounts of fiat that dilutes the savings of hardworking people everywhere. Now, it’s also  important to remember who’s speaking here. I am not a Bitcoin OG. I had a chance to buy 10,000  Bitcoin in 2011 for about $10,000.
 In other words, a dollar per Bitcoin, but I was too lazy to  investigate. And I told my friend that it probably wouldn’t change my net worth that much.  That position is obviously worth about $670 million today.  So it would have moved the dial on my net worth a tremendous amount.  But I’m not blaming anyone else for this.  It was my own TradFi arrogance and laziness that made me miss out.
 I had multiple chances to buy and to research Bitcoin from 2011 to 2019,  and I still didn’t do it. So it was almost a decade that I knew about it, and yet I didn’t  buy any. Is that someone else’s fault? No, I think it’s my fault. And here’s the thing,  you didn’t even need to have any money back in 2011 to get a lot of Bitcoin.
 You just had to  have some intellectual curiosity and do some research. For example,  you could have gotten five Bitcoin for free from faucets like this. And I believe the original Gavin Andreessen faucet was giving out 15 Bitcoin. All you had to do was enter a captcha or solve a  captcha, and then you would get five to 50 Bitcoin sent to you.
 And over the years, 19,700 were sent by Gavin Andreessen from this particular  faucet. So again, you didn’t even need to have any money to get five Bitcoin, which is worth a  tremendous amount of money now. So central bankers and the fiat politicians who’ve been telling us  for years that Bitcoin is going to zero, they’ve been very, very wrong. And all of their arguments  have fallen flat and all the evidence is’ve been very, very wrong and all of their arguments have fallen  flat and all the evidence is against them now, especially the price performance of Bitcoin over  the past 15 years. They were wrong. So now is it our fault for holding on for dear life, for
 hodling? The volatility has been incredibly painful at times, even just since 2020. And I wasn’t really  hodling before late 2019, early 2020.  I put on a brave face for this channel at times, but there were days in late 2022 when I felt physically ill for weeks from my collapsing Bitcoin investment because I’d gone  all in. There’s also the hypocrisy of it all. You want to talk about wealth redistribution.
 No one plays the game of wealth redistribution more than central bankers and politicians who get to print up or steal money through taxation while the rest of us have to work  for it. So when you talk about wealth redistribution as these authors want to,  it’s really the bankers and the fiat politicians who are to blame for this.
 I think Pierre Rochard sums it up nicely here. Message for fiat bros, please don’t lecture us  about Bitcoin’s inequality after you printed trillions of euros and trillions of dollars to bail out your bankers and politicians.  That pretty much sums it up. Here’s another thing as well that’s really important to remember.
 Don’t assume that just because someone has been in Bitcoin for a long time that they’re rich.  Many Bitcoin OGs spent or lost their coins and not just in fake, quote unquote,  boating accidents. As Rahim here points out, as one of the few economists who was also early in  Bitcoin, I can dispute some of the opinions presented as facts in this report and thread  talking about how rich Bitcoin OGs got.
 I’ve experienced a continuous, quote unquote,  redistribution of early Bitcoiners to later Bitcoiners. In other words, the Bitcoin flowing from these early people to later people like you  and me. Almost all who went in early for the money have sold soon after. The others lost most of  their Bitcoin due to errors, experiments, failed ventures, listening to quote-unquote experts,  social pressures.
 Building on the errors, learnings, and investments of early Bitcoiners,  it has become easier and easier to have Bitcoin exposure. Ten years ago, Juergen Schaaf, who’s  one of the authors of this paper, ignored it. Some years ago, he ridiculed it, predicting loss of  value. Now he fights it. That pretty much sums it up. And if you want to go down this rabbit hole  a bit, I have an old video about how I talk about why many Bitcoin OGs are poor.
 So here’s the conclusion from this ECB paper, quote, current non-holders of Bitcoin should  realize that they have compelling reasons to oppose Bitcoin and advocate for legislation  against it, aiming to prevent Bitcoin prices from rising or to see Bitcoin disappear altogether.  I got news for you  bankers. You keep printing. There’s nothing you can do to stop Bitcoin’s price.
 And there’s nothing  you can do to stop Bitcoin’s price either. But here he is. Here the authors are advocating for  legislation against Bitcoin. Late comers, quote, late comers and non-holders and their political  representatives should emphasize that the idea of Bitcoin as an investment relies on redistribution at their expense. Such a ridiculous statement. Bitcoiners.
 And also expect bankers and  politicians to blame Bitcoiners for the very inflation that they themselves caused through  money printing and out-of-control deficit spending. And this is something I predicted  approximately a year ago, that there would be a future scenario where governments and central  bankers would attempt to blame Bitcoiners for the inflation and currency devaluation that was actually caused by the central bank’s  monetizing government deficit spending. Here’s the conclusion.
 Central bankers,  like the authors of this paper, preside over what’s called fiat money, money that’s just  generated out of nothing. Fiat money is controlled by a small group of insiders and used to pick the pockets  of hardworking people all over the world through inflation. So we’re taxed, but then there’s this  stealth tax called inflation that everyone’s subject to.
 Fiat money is imposed on people  under threat of violence and imprisonment. For example, if I don’t use US dollars to pay my US  taxes, I end up in a metal cage and I never opted into this system.  I was never given a choice. By contrast, Bitcoin is a voluntary system, unlike fiat. Bitcoin has  never been forced on anyone.
 Bitcoin is open to everyone, regardless of race, tribe, religion,  skin color, sexual orientation, political affiliation, etc. And when you hear this,  you should ask yourself, how many times have bankers and fiat politicians discriminated against people all over the world?  Bitcoin never discriminates against anyone because Bitcoin is fair, neutral money for the world’s  8 billion people, most of whom suffer under currency regimes that are far worse than the  US dollar or the euro.
 These currency regimes, much weaker currencies  that steal their economic energy,  the economic energy of the people  and ensure that these people can never get ahead.  So if you don’t opt into the Bitcoin system,  that’s your decision.  If the ECB was actually so concerned about this problem,  then the ECB or the various EU constituents  and governments should accumulate  a few billion euros worth of Bitcoin and hold it for the people of Europe.
 And paying 62,000 euros per Bitcoin or wherever it is  now, still an amazing deal if Bitcoin is headed to 10 million per coin, as the ECB itself believes  is possible. Or maybe it’s just this, maybe European bankers and politicians don’t actually  care about the people that they’re supposed to be looking out for.
 And writing papers like this is really just concern trolling,  and they’re just worried about their own fiat positions. Maybe they’re just mad because they  see the writing on the wall and finally are beginning to realize that the jig is almost  up for them and their corrupt cronies. We’re now definitely entering the stage where they fight us.  It’s going to get really ugly first, but then we’re going to win.
 
(22) How Bitcoin Will Hit $1M By 2030 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvQeWyZBiqE
Transcript:
 In today’s video, I want to seriously consider this crazy idea that Bitcoin will reach $1 million a coin by 2030.  And this isn’t even my idea.  One of the world’s most respected hedge fund managers, Cathie Wood, believes that this will happen.  Billionaire co-founder of PayPal, Peter Thiel, agrees with her.
 There are so many others, billionaires like Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey, Mike Novogratz,  the Winklevoss twins, who all believe this crazy theory is possible. Now before you laugh this  idea off and say, not gonna happen, let me share with you some data, some facts, and statistics  that supports this theory because the idea of the million dollar Bitcoin is based on another idea, which is scarcity.
 Now, there’s only ever supposed to be 21 million Bitcoins in all of existence,  but it will take us another 118 years before we mine all the Bitcoins and before all 21 million  actually exist. That will take us to the year 2140. But as of today, over 90% of Bitcoin’s entire supply already exists.
 It will  take us over a century to get access to just the other 10%. But here’s what’s crazier. If all the  world’s millionaires decided to buy just one Bitcoin, they wouldn’t be able to because there’s  not enough to go around. According to Credit Suisse, as of 2020,  there are roughly 56 million millionaires around the world,  which means each millionaire would only be able to buy  a little over a third of a Bitcoin,  which is technically wrong because as of today,  there’s more millionaires, and more importantly,
 roughly 20% of Bitcoin’s entire supply  has been lost forever.  Something like 4 million Bitcoins will never be recovered,  which means the real supply of Bitcoin is closer to 17 million,  which makes it that much more scarce.  So in today’s video, I want to talk about some of these facts and data points  that support this crazy theory of the million dollar Bitcoin  by 2030. I’m excited. Let’s get right into it. Hi, my name is Andrej Csik. Hope you’re doing well.
 Come for the finance and stay for the crypto. So right now, Bitcoin is worth about $42,000  and its market cap about $800 billion. Here’s what it’s going to take for us to get to a million  dollar Bitcoin. We would need to 25 times our  investment and the market cap at that point would be worth closer to 20 trillion dollars, which is  an insane amount of money.
 Just for reference, here’s what a billion dollars looks like next  to a couch and a group of people. That’s a lot of money, but it’s not a trillion. Here’s what a  trillion dollars looks like next to the White House and a football field. It’s also a pretty accurate representation of how much Bitcoin is  worth today rounding up. But that’s not 20 trillion. We need to get to 20.
 And incidentally,  here’s what 20 trillion dollars looks like next to the Statue of Liberty and skyscrapers full  of money. That is an insane amount of money.  Credit to Visual Capitalist for the reference, but to go from this to that in just 8 short  years seems pretty impossible.  But now let me share with you some data about how it might actually happen.
 The first thing we have to talk about is how much money it actually takes to move the price  of Bitcoin. Because the  idea of the million dollar Bitcoin is flawed if we’re looking at it through the lens of market  caps like I used to, and I know so many people do.
 Because even though a market cap is supposed to  tell us how much money is in the entire system, it doesn’t and it’s kind of confusing. All a market  cap does is it takes the current supply of something and multiplies it by  the current price, which is the last known sale price. That’s all it does. For example, right now,  Bitcoin’s market cap is roughly $800 billion.
 It does not mean, though, that $800 billion worth  is inside of the Bitcoin ecosystem. And if Bitcoin goes to zero tomorrow, it does not mean that investors will lose  $800 billion worth of value.  All it’s doing is taking Bitcoin’s current price  of $42,700 and multiplying it  by the current supply outstanding,  which is 19 million coins,  to get the implied value of $800 billion.
 The implication though, is that if you were to sell  all 19 million at 42,700, you would get $800 billion,  which you wouldn’t, because if you were to sell all of it,  you would affect the price on the way down.  That’s why Bitcoin’s value is not its price  or its market cap.  A perfect example of this is the stock market.
 Apple’s market cap right now is 2.78 trillion dollars.  And the way this number is generated is it’s taking all of the stocks that are available in total and  multiplying them by the current price of Apple to get 2.78 trillion dollars, but it does not mean that Apple has  2.78 trillion dollars worth of stuff.
 There’s also the price to earnings ratio, right?  seven, eight trillion dollars worth of stuff. There’s also the price to earnings ratio, right?  Which Apple’s right now is over 28,  which means investors are paying over 28 times the price  of what it’s earning per year  for the opportunity of investing in Apple  because they expect Apple to grow  and make more money in the future.
 It’s crazy misleading how this works,  but I guess it’s kind of like a good magic trick  where you see how I’m showing you all these cards right here?  Watch.  Sometimes less is actually more.  That’s not a good magic trick, but you get the idea.  Right now you can technically start a billion dollar company with just a dollar.
 All it takes is for you to create a company with a billion shares outstanding and sell  one share to someone else for a dollar and that would give you the implied value of a  billion dollar company.  Now Bitcoin does not have a PE ratio because it’s not a stock and it’s not a company,  but the logic is very close and you don’t need as much money as you think to move its  price.
 And the best evidence of this was on December 20, 2020.  It all started when Tesla bought $1.5 billion worth  of Bitcoin.  It was then on December 20, 2020,  when Elon Musk asked Michael Saylor  if it was even possible to buy a billion dollars worth  of Bitcoin.  And that’s when people started to buy the rumor  that maybe Elon was getting into Bitcoin.
 That’s when I knew the price would skyrocket,  which is exactly what ended up happening.  In Q4 of 2020, that’s when Tesla and Elon bought Bitcoin,  but the world didn’t officially know about it  until the SEC filing, which was February 8th, 2021.  And check out what happened to the price.  Bitcoin opened the day of the tweet at $23,000.
 But by the time it was officially announced on February 8th, Bitcoin was up to $48,000.  It more than doubled. So in the span of a little over a month, did people really spend over $430  billion on Bitcoin to double its price? There is no way that happened. The real dollar amount was a lot  lower. And to figure it out would be impossible without knowing each and every single transaction.
 But theoretically, it would be as little as 10 to 20% of its market cap, which means instead of  needing $20 trillion, we might only need $2 to $4 trillion in inflows to make a million dollar Bitcoin possible.  Now, as of right now,  that averages out to 96 months in the next eight years,  which would break that down to $21 billion a month,  which is still a lot of money,  but it’s a lot more doable than what we had before.
 And just for comparison,  right now we are inflowing about $2 billion a month,  and that’s being very favorable to Bitcoin, which means we are off by a factor of 10.  So that means it’s going to be pretty impossible to get to that point in the next eight years.  Or will it?  There are some catalysts that might make it happen.
 Please keep in mind that some of these are completely subjective,  but they’re relatively conservative in relation to what they are. But within the next eight years, Bitcoin will either  completely disrupt or play at least a conservative role inside of these eight major markets. Credits  to Yasin on Twitter for this one. And the first is the remittance market.
 This is where we send  money from one country to another like we did to help Ukraine. This is slow, it’s expensive,  it’s closed on weekends, and Bitcoin is undeniably the  better system than we have today.  If Bitcoin can capture 50% of the remittance market, that would add roughly $300 billion  to its market cap, or $14,000 a coin.
 Number two is a big one.  This is the emerging market currencies.  This is referring to what’s called the M2 supply of money.  This is all things like cash, physical coins, checking, savings accounts.  In other words, money that is easy to convert.  And the emerging part is referring to countries that are transitioning from development to  modernization.
 A good example is the Chinese renminbi, the Russian ruble, the Brazilian real, the Indian  rupee, things like that.  This is where Bitcoin could be a good proposition for store of value. Now, if Bitcoin can capture  10% of the global market here, this would add $2.8 trillion, or roughly $133,000 a coin to the value of Bitcoin, and that’s excluding the top four countries of emerging currencies.
 The third is the economic settlement network.  This is where banks send money to each other,  and all of this happens digitally,  but at some point, they’ll want to settle in a final currency,  which is usually the dollar, but it doesn’t have to be.  It could be a digital currency like  Bitcoin.
 And if Bitcoin could capture just 25% of the market share here, that would add  $3.8 trillion, or $181,000 a coin.  A fourth market is nation-state treasury. And you can think of this as the cash reserves  of a country or like its little emergency fund. And if Bitcoin can capture just 1% of the global market here, that would add another  $3.8 trillion or $181,000 a coin.  A fifth catalyst is HNWIs, high net worth individuals.
 If those people held 5% of their assets in Bitcoin, that would add another $4 trillion  to the market cap or roughly $190,000 a coin.  A sixth catalyst is institutional investment.  These are people like BlackRock.  And if only 2.5% of their assets were held in Bitcoin, that would add another $4.
1 trillion  to the market cap, or roughly $196,000 a coin.  A seventh market is corporate treasury bonds.  This is where companies raise capital by creating some debt, and if only 5% of their money was  held in Bitcoin here, that would add $4.2 trillion to the market cap, or roughly $200,000  to the value of Bitcoin.
 And finally, eight, that would be gold.  to the value of Bitcoin, and finally, eight, that would be gold. If Bitcoin can reach half of gold’s market cap at $5.5 trillion, that would add $260,000 to the value of Bitcoin. Now, obviously,  a lot of this is very subjective, and we can play with the math and spin the numbers however we want,  but we could probably both agree that this is relatively conservative. It’s not assuming that Bitcoin is going to take over the world.
 But altogether, the grand total market cap would be $28.5 trillion,  which would imply a Bitcoin price of $1.36 million.  Some people say $28.5 trillion is just impossible because it is too big.  But to put that in perspective for you,  that is still way less than the global value of the equity market, that’s the stock market,  which is valued at $106 trillion.
 That would still be much less than the global supply of M2 money,  which is $123 trillion. That is still way less than the global value of the bond market, which is $124 trillion,  and that is still almost 10 times less than the global value of real estate at $220 trillion.  So suddenly, when you put it in that perspective, $28.
5 trillion doesn’t sound all that impossible,  especially over the next eight years.  So the next question is, should you buy Bitcoin before it hits a million dollars?  And the answer is, absolutely not.  Bitcoin is obviously a bubble.  According to 3 and 4 professional investors from a Bank of America survey, the guys from  the Big Short movie think Bitcoin is a bubble, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger think Bitcoin  is a bubble, but all of those are just their opinions and they’re not giving us any data.
 Instead, here’s some actual useful data to help you figure that out.  It’s called the Mayer multiple and it tells you Bitcoin’s historical price in relation  to its 200-day moving average.  It doesn’t tell you when to buy or when to sell, it just gives you some historical context.  And right now, it’s making a pretty good case for buying Bitcoin because anytime the mayor multiple was below 2.
4 that’s when historically it’s  been a good time to buy anything above that is expensive now as of right now at  the current price of forty two thousand seven hundred dollars the mayor multiple  is zero point eight nine so it’s approaching 1. Historically, Bitcoin’s average has been 1.41, and it’s been  higher than today’s mayor multiple 76% of the time.
 So as of right now, we’re in that rare  period of time where Bitcoin is below its historical average, which doesn’t mean you  should go to buy it, but it does mean if you believe Bitcoin will reach a million dollars  someday, now might be a good time to start dollar cost averaging.  Which is kind of crazy to think about that people in 2017 were upset about buying Bitcoin  at $20,000 when now it’s sitting in the 40s.
 I feel like now we all wish we could buy Bitcoin at $20,000 and I think that’s going to continue  to be true with each and every cycle.  And by 2030, I don’t believe that Bitcoin is going to replace banking.  It’s not going to replace the dollar, and it will not replace gold.  And it doesn’t have to.  All it needs is a little market share from a couple different industries, which is exactly  what’s happening right now to get us to a million.
 Everything is going exactly as it was planned.  I don’t know whose plan it was, but I like the plan. Let’s stick with it. As always, have a wonderful rest of your day.  Smash the like button. Subscribe if you haven’t already. Go grab up to $250 worth of free Bitcoin  right here. Go grab your free stocks.