Curriculum
Course: What is Crypto
Login
Video lesson

Michael Saylor Bitcoin 2024 Keynote

Digital Capital and the Bitcoin Revolution: Future of Wealth

Unpacking Saylor’s Bitcoin Vision:

Is there a way to escape the inevitable decay that plagues our wealth over time? This question sits at the heart of Michael Saylor’s argument in his recent Bitcoin 2024 keynote, where he passionately makes the case for Bitcoin as the ultimate form of digital capital. As traditional financial systems wrestle with inflation, taxes, and the complexities of asset management, Saylor suggests that Bitcoin offers a revolutionary alternative—an asset that transcends time, space, and physical limitations. But is this vision grounded in reality? And how does it intersect with the broader currents of finance and technology? Let’s delve into Saylor’s perspective and critically assess the ideas that could shape the future of money.

Why Bitcoin Is More Than Digital Gold:

In his keynote, Michael Saylor argues that Bitcoin is not just a speculative asset but a new form of capital that challenges traditional financial paradigms. He contrasts the limitations of physical and financial assets, like real estate and stocks, which degrade over time due to maintenance costs and inflation. Saylor claims that Bitcoin’s decentralized, digital nature allows it to maintain value far longer than conventional assets. He frames Bitcoin as an answer to what he calls the “entropy” of money—its tendency to lose purchasing power over time. Notably, he draws upon concepts from physics, such as energy and frequency, to explain how Bitcoin could preserve wealth over centuries or even millennia. While acknowledging the challenges and risks, Saylor paints a picture of a world where Bitcoin serves as a cornerstone of economic stability, offering a way out of the “decay game” that traditional assets play.

Critical Analysis:

Strengths of the Argument: Bitcoin’s Enduring Value

One of Saylor’s strongest arguments lies in his discussion of Bitcoin as a form of “digital capital” that resists the forces of decay. Traditional assets like real estate, stocks, or even cash are subject to wear and tear—whether through inflation, taxes, or physical deterioration. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is free from many of these constraints. Its decentralized nature means that it isn’t tied to any single government’s monetary policy, making it less susceptible to hyperinflation like that seen in countries such as Argentina or Turkey. For example, while the Argentine peso might lose most of its value in a few years due to inflation, Bitcoin’s limited supply of 21 million coins inherently resists such dilution, offering a stable store of value.

Saylor’s analogy of Bitcoin as a “1,000-year asset” resonates, especially when compared to assets like real estate, which may need significant maintenance or be subject to local taxation over time. This long-term perspective challenges conventional investment wisdom, which tends to focus on shorter time horizons. It’s a compelling vision, especially for those looking to preserve wealth across generations—something that aligns well with the CFIRE training program’s emphasis on strategic, long-term wealth building.

Where the Argument Falters: Challenges to the Digital Dream

However, Saylor’s vision isn’t without its criticisms. A key challenge to the idea of Bitcoin as a permanent store of value is its volatility. While Saylor emphasizes the long-term trajectory of Bitcoin, the reality is that many investors are wary of its drastic price swings. For example, Bitcoin’s price dropped from nearly $70,000 in late 2021 to around $16,000 by the end of 2022, a stark reminder of its unpredictability. This volatility can undermine its role as a stable store of value, especially for those who cannot afford to weather such fluctuations.

Another area of critique is Saylor’s focus on Bitcoin as a universal solution to economic decay. While Bitcoin’s fixed supply is a unique strength, it doesn’t inherently solve issues like wealth inequality or access to financial services. Critics argue that Bitcoin’s design may disproportionately benefit those who adopt it early, leaving latecomers at a disadvantage. Additionally, the energy consumption of Bitcoin mining is often cited as a potential environmental concern, with the network’s proof-of-work system requiring significant power—raising questions about its sustainability as a long-term asset.

Bridging the Gap: How Crypto Connects to Traditional Finance

Saylor’s argument also prompts a closer look at how Bitcoin fits within the broader world of finance and economics. His comparison between traditional asset lifespans and Bitcoin’s durability highlights a fundamental shift from physical to digital value. For example, in the traditional finance world, bonds or treasury securities have been considered the go-to options for preserving wealth over decades. But Saylor suggests that Bitcoin, with its transparency and algorithmic supply control, offers a better alternative. It’s an intriguing proposition, especially in a world where inflation continues to challenge central banks’ efforts to maintain currency stability.

This concept is not entirely new to the crypto space. The rise of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) offers a glimpse into how financial systems could operate without the need for traditional banks. DeFi protocols like Aave and Compound allow users to lend, borrow, and earn interest without intermediaries, making finance more accessible and potentially more secure. This aligns with Saylor’s vision of a world where digital assets like Bitcoin play a central role in preserving wealth and facilitating transactions. However, unlike Bitcoin’s focus on being a store of value, DeFi projects emphasize financial services, providing an interesting complement to Saylor’s more singular focus.

Connections to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain:

Saylor’s arguments about Bitcoin’s potential as a long-term store of value resonate deeply within the crypto ecosystem. His emphasis on the scarcity of Bitcoin and its comparison to gold draws directly from the stock-to-flow model, which has long been used by Bitcoin enthusiasts to predict price movements based on scarcity. The idea is simple yet powerful: if Bitcoin’s supply is limited, and demand grows, then its price should rise over time, mirroring the dynamics of gold but with the added benefits of digital portability and divisibility.

Moreover, Saylor’s vision of Bitcoin as “immortal, immutable, and immaterial” plays into broader debates within the crypto world about decentralization and trust. Unlike fiat currencies, which rely on trust in central banks, Bitcoin operates on a trustless network—meaning that transactions are verified by cryptographic proof rather than institutional oversight. This makes it particularly appealing in regions where trust in government is low, such as Venezuela, where citizens have turned to Bitcoin as a hedge against hyperinflation.

Yet, it’s essential to recognize the challenges inherent in translating traditional financial principles to the crypto space. For instance, the self-custody model Saylor champions—where users hold their Bitcoin in secure wallets—requires a level of technical literacy that many new entrants to the space may lack. This contrasts with traditional banks, which manage assets on behalf of customers, simplifying the process but also introducing risks of centralized failure. While Bitcoin offers the promise of greater control, it also places a significant burden of responsibility on the individual.

Broader Implications and Future Outlook:

The implications of Saylor’s vision extend far beyond Bitcoin itself. If digital assets become the primary means of storing wealth, as Saylor suggests, it could dramatically alter global financial systems. Imagine a world where Bitcoin is widely used as a treasury reserve by corporations and even nations. This shift could decentralize global power structures, reducing the influence of traditional banking institutions and shifting financial power toward decentralized networks.

Additionally, as AI and automation continue to transform industries, Saylor’s concept of “immaterial capital” gains relevance. If we imagine a future where AI handles the management of digital assets like Bitcoin, the barriers to entry could be significantly lowered. This could democratize access to financial tools that were previously the domain of the wealthy and well-connected, potentially reducing global inequality.

However, the path to such a future is not without obstacles. Regulation remains a critical factor, especially as governments grapple with how to classify and tax digital assets. While Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it resistant to control, heavy-handed regulations could stifle innovation or push crypto activities into the shadows. Moreover, the environmental impact of proof-of-work mining could become a more pressing concern as climate action becomes a priority for policymakers.

Personal Commentary and Insights:

From my perspective, Saylor’s vision is both bold and inspiring, yet it requires a dose of realism. The promise of Bitcoin as a durable, decentralized store of value is compelling, especially in a world where traditional financial systems often fail to serve their populations. His emphasis on shifting from decaying physical assets to resilient digital ones is a valuable insight for those seeking to navigate the evolving landscape of wealth preservation.

However, the focus on Bitcoin’s strengths sometimes overshadows its practical limitations. The idea that Bitcoin is immune to all forms of decay ignores the complexities of network security, potential protocol updates, and the social dynamics of adoption. It’s crucial for investors to understand that while Bitcoin offers a unique set of advantages, it’s not a magic bullet for all economic challenges.

Yet, Saylor’s argument holds a transformative potential that aligns well with the ethos of the CFIRE training program. It encourages us to think beyond conventional investment strategies, embracing the idea that new technologies can reshape old paradigms. The challenge lies in balancing optimism with critical thinking—a skill that every investor must develop in their journey through the crypto space.

Conclusion:

In reviewing Michael Saylor’s arguments, it’s clear that Bitcoin’s potential as digital capital offers a revolutionary way to think about wealth preservation. Its ability to resist inflation, bypass traditional financial gatekeepers, and empower individuals with self-sovereignty makes it a significant player in the evolving landscape of finance. Yet, this vision requires careful consideration of risks, from market volatility to regulatory hurdles. For those willing to embrace its promise, Bitcoin could be a key pillar in a diversified wealth strategy—one that challenges the status quo and points to a new financial future. As part of the Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training program, this lesson underscores the importance of strategic thinking and the pursuit of knowledge in a world where change is the only constant.

Next…

You’ve just scratched the surface of what makes Bitcoin a potential game-changer in the world of finance. Keep pushing forward! The next lesson in the CFIRE training program will delve deeper into the mechanics of blockchain technology, giving you the tools to fully understand the foundation of the crypto revolution. Stay curious, and let’s continue exploring this exciting frontier together!


Quotes:

  1. “Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it less susceptible to hyperinflation, offering a stable store of value in a world where fiat currencies falter.”
  2. “If digital assets become the primary means of storing wealth, it could dramatically alter global financial systems, decentralizing power in ways previously unimaginable.”
  3. “The promise of Bitcoin as a durable, decentralized store of value is compelling, but it’s not a magic bullet for all economic challenges.”

 

 

Bitcoin Revolution: Redefining Wealth Preservation in the 21st Century

In this lesson, we’ll explore the transformative potential of Bitcoin as a tool for capital preservation, comparing it to traditional financial and physical assets. We’ll dissect why Michael Saylor sees Bitcoin as “digital capital” with the potential to reshape the global economy. You’ll learn how traditional concepts of wealth and asset management intersect with the world of cryptocurrencies, providing insight into why Bitcoin might be the solution to long-standing economic challenges. This lesson is a key part of the Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training plan, designed to deepen your understanding of Bitcoin’s role in the financial landscape and its strategic value in building long-term wealth.


Core Concepts:

  1. Digital Capital

    • Traditional Finance: Refers to capital stored in forms like stocks, bonds, or real estate, which can depreciate over time due to maintenance costs, inflation, and taxes.
    • Crypto: Bitcoin represents a form of digital capital that isn’t subject to the same decay, offering long-term value retention with minimal maintenance.
    • Importance: Understanding this helps beginners see how Bitcoin could revolutionize wealth storage beyond conventional assets.
  2. Stock-to-Flow Ratio

    • Traditional Finance: Used to measure the scarcity of commodities like gold by comparing the existing supply with annual production.
    • Crypto: In Bitcoin, it’s a measure of scarcity, highlighting its limited supply and deflationary nature.
    • Importance: A high stock-to-flow ratio in Bitcoin suggests its potential as a robust store of value, making it a valuable tool for long-term capital preservation.
  3. Entropy in Asset Management

    • Traditional Finance: Entropy refers to the natural decay or devaluation of assets due to external factors like inflation, taxes, and maintenance costs.
    • Crypto: Bitcoin is seen as resistant to entropy, as it doesn’t degrade in value due to physical conditions or inflation in the same way.
    • Importance: This concept highlights why Bitcoin is positioned as a better alternative for preserving wealth over time.
  4. Custodial and Self-Custodial Models

    • Traditional Finance: Involves banks and financial institutions managing assets, with associated fees and risks.
    • Crypto: Bitcoin allows self-custody, where individuals can directly control their assets with minimal ongoing costs, making it more resilient against institutional failures.
    • Importance: This emphasizes the control and independence that Bitcoin offers compared to traditional systems, aligning with the principles of decentralization.
  5. Economic Energy

    • Traditional Finance: Represents the ability of capital to maintain its purchasing power over time, often diminished by inflation and depreciation.
    • Crypto: Bitcoin is seen as a means of preserving economic energy because of its deflationary nature and global liquidity.
    • Importance: For beginners, this is critical to understand why Bitcoin’s value retention over time can outperform many traditional assets.

Key Sections:

1. The Problem with Traditional Asset Management

  • Summary: Traditional assets face depreciation due to inflation, taxes, and physical decay.
  • Key Points:
    • Financial assets like stocks and bonds have a limited lifespan, often less than 30 years due to inflation.
    • Physical assets like real estate are subject to wear, maintenance, and various forms of taxation.
    • Saylor highlights how even historically valuable assets like gold have finite lifespans when maintenance costs are factored in.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    Traditional financial systems are built around assets that degrade in value over time. Inflation, taxes, and maintenance costs reduce their long-term viability. For instance, the average lifespan of U.S. dollar savings is estimated at 14 years before inflation significantly erodes purchasing power. This dynamic limits the ability of traditional assets to preserve wealth across generations.
  • Crypto Connection:
    Bitcoin, as a digital asset, is designed to avoid these pitfalls. It has a fixed supply of 21 million coins, making it resistant to inflation. Unlike real estate or gold, Bitcoin doesn’t require upkeep, and its decentralized nature means it’s not bound by regional or national tax regimes.

2. Physics of Money: Energy, Frequency, and Vibration

  • Summary: Applying physical principles to money management helps illustrate how capital can be preserved or lost over time.
  • Key Points:
    • Saylor uses Tesla’s philosophy of energy, frequency, and vibration to describe the flow of money.
    • The “useful life” of money is determined by how much is lost annually to maintain or preserve its value.
    • Financial assets decay due to inflation and other costs, but Bitcoin offers a way to minimize these losses.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    Saylor suggests that like energy, money has a natural flow and decay. If left unmanaged, it will lose value. The cost of maintaining a financial asset (e.g., managing a property or paying hedge fund fees) eats away at its longevity. Bitcoin, however, requires minimal upkeep and can be managed at a fraction of the cost through secure storage solutions like hardware wallets.
  • Crypto Connection:
    Bitcoin’s low maintenance requirements (e.g., self-custody with hardware wallets) mean that it can be preserved with minimal annual costs, making it a potential 10,000-year asset. This contrasts sharply with the maintenance-heavy nature of traditional assets like real estate.

3. Long-Duration Assets vs. Short-Duration Assets

  • Summary: Assets can be classified based on how long they retain value. Saylor contrasts short-term assets like cash with long-term digital assets like Bitcoin.
  • Key Points:
    • Cash and fiat currencies have short durations due to inflationary pressures.
    • Real estate and gold offer longer durations but come with significant upkeep costs.
    • Bitcoin is positioned as a long-duration asset with potentially indefinite lifespan.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    While a diversified portfolio of stocks or real estate can hold value for decades, Bitcoin aims to hold value over centuries. Real estate, with a useful life of around 50-75 years, eventually decays due to taxes, maintenance, and government regulations. Bitcoin, however, has no physical form, making it immune to these issues.
  • Crypto Connection:
    Bitcoin’s potential as a long-duration asset aligns with the CFIRE training’s emphasis on strategic, long-term investment. It’s a fundamentally different approach from traditional wealth preservation, focusing on digital durability over physical maintenance.

4. Strategies for Individual and Institutional Investors

  • Summary: Saylor outlines strategies for individuals, companies, and even nations to invest in Bitcoin as part of a long-term wealth strategy.
  • Key Points:
    • Individuals can benefit by converting a portion of their assets to Bitcoin and considering leveraged strategies.
    • Corporations can increase shareholder value by adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets.
    • Nations can enhance financial stability through strategic Bitcoin acquisitions.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    For individuals, moving from traditional savings to Bitcoin can amplify wealth preservation, especially with disciplined savings and investment strategies. Companies like MicroStrategy have already demonstrated the potential benefits of this approach. By holding Bitcoin instead of cash, they can achieve superior returns over time.
  • Crypto Connection:
    These strategies align with the broader principles of the CFIRE program, focusing on building wealth through understanding and leveraging Bitcoin’s unique value proposition.

Examples:

  1. Comparing Capital Preservation:

    • Traditional example: Holding $1 million in U.S. Treasury bonds, with an annual yield eroded by inflation.
    • Crypto example: Holding $1 million in Bitcoin, with its value driven by scarcity and global demand.
  2. Self-Custody vs. Bank Custody:

    • Traditional example: A bank holds your gold, charging storage fees.
    • Crypto example: Using a hardware wallet for Bitcoin, maintaining control with minimal costs.
  3. Digital Durability:

    • Traditional example: A $10 million mansion requires regular upkeep to retain its value.
    • Crypto example: Bitcoin can be stored digitally, without physical decay or maintenance.

Real-World Applications:

  • Historical Context: The transition from physical gold to paper currency reshaped the global economy. Similarly, Bitcoin represents a shift from physical and financial assets to digital assets, promising a new era of capital preservation.
  • Crypto History: Since its creation in 2009, Bitcoin’s market cap has grown to over $1 trillion, reflecting its increasing role as a store of value in the global economy.

Cause and Effect Relationships:

  • Inflation and Asset Devaluation: Traditional currencies lose value as inflation rises, causing individuals to seek alternatives like Bitcoin.
  • Adoption of Bitcoin: As more institutions adopt Bitcoin as a treasury reserve, its value stabilizes, increasing its attractiveness as a store of value.

Challenges and Solutions:

  • Challenge: Volatility in Bitcoin’s price can deter some investors.
    • Solution: Dollar-cost averaging and long-term holding can mitigate volatility risks.
  • Challenge: Regulatory uncertainty around Bitcoin in certain countries.
    • Solution: Educating investors on self-custody and international regulations can empower them to manage risks

Key Takeaways:

  1. Bitcoin represents a unique form of digital capital with a potential lifespan far beyond traditional assets.
  2. Its scarcity, as measured by the stock-to-flow ratio, makes it a strong candidate for long-term value storage.
  3. Unlike physical assets, Bitcoin doesn’t suffer from decay, maintenance costs, or geographical restrictions.
  4. Strategies like self-custody can make Bitcoin more accessible and manageable for individual investors.
  5. The integration of Bitcoin into corporate and national treasuries could reshape global financial strategies.
  6. Understanding Bitcoin’s role in preserving economic energy is crucial for anyone looking to build long-term wealth.

Discussion Questions and Scenarios:

  1. How does Bitcoin’s stock-to-flow ratio compare to that of gold, and what does this imply for its value?
  2. What are the risks and benefits of self-custody compared to using a custodial service?
  3. Imagine a nation adopting Bitcoin as a reserve asset. What economic impacts could this have?
  4. How does the concept of economic energy apply to your current savings strategy?
  5. Compare the potential longevity of a physical asset like real estate with Bitcoin.
  6. What challenges might a corporation face when deciding to allocate part of its treasury to Bitcoin?
  7. How might Bitcoin’s adoption by AIs and automated systems affect its future valuation?

Glossary:

  • Stock-to-Flow Ratio: A measure of scarcity, comparing existing stockpiles with annual production.
  • Custodial Services: Third-party entities that manage and secure assets on behalf of investors.
  • Economic Energy: The potential of money to retain purchasing power over time.
  • Digital Capital: Assets like Bitcoin that exist entirely in a digital form without physical constraints.

 

You’ve taken an important step in understanding how Bitcoin can reshape wealth management. Keep going! Your next lesson in the Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training program will dive deeper into the blockchain technology that powers Bitcoin. Let’s continue building your crypto knowledge together!


 

 

Read Video Transcript
What an awesome gathering of Bitcoiners.  I am delighted to be here in Nashville, a city known for music, a city known for freedom, and I’m decided to use slides.  And for those of you who have seen my presentation, some are with slides, some are without slides.  I got a lot of good comments on the ones with slides, and so I figured the best way to make  this presentation better was more slides. So, number go up.
 And with no more delay,  I want to talk about the Bitcoin revolution.  And I also want to talk about rebuilding our global economy with digital capital.  The world as we know it  is based on 20th century ideas and 20th century technology.  Stocks trade 9.30 to 4 unless there’s a bank holiday.  You can’t do things on the weekend.
 Everything is slow.  Everything is expensive.  If we want to prosper in the 21st century, we need new ideas and they need to be based on new technology.  This chart you’ve seen before, I popped it up, it’s 900 trillion dollars of global wealth.  It’s that 900 trillion, it’s spread across physical assets and financial assets that are 20th century ideas, 20th century technology.
 And in the upper left corner is a little orange blip, the little orange asset that could,  what we call Bitcoin.  It’s one trillion.  It seems like a lot if you start it with zero, but when you look at it against the greater  scheme of things in the world, it’s 0.1%.  Here’s another way to see that same chart.
 It’s not 900 trillion of assets.  It’s a bunch of assets held for their utility value and a bunch of assets held as a store of value, long-term capital.  When I buy a house, I want to live in it.  of value, long-term capital. When I buy a house, I want to live in it, but when I buy a bunch of bonds, I just put my money there because I didn’t know what else to do with the money.
 And when you start to see the world as a big chunk of long-term capital, 450 trillion dollars or more  of capital, and you start to think about the way we store that capital, you see the engine for the revolution.  The global economy struggles because we’re relying upon imperfect assets and imperfect systems to store that capital.
 It’s crippling our capital preservation.  So how do we engineer a better system?  Well, this is Tesla, and Tesla had a quote  He said, you want to understand the universe?  Think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration  I’m going to translate that  I’m going to talk about the physics of money now  What are the physics of money?  Energy is money, or capital, or wealth.
 You could use them interchangeably for this speech.  Frequency is about the duration or the lifespan.  How long will it take? A minute, an hour, a year, a century?  And we vibrate money every time we trade with each other,  or we transfer from one locale  to another, or we transform a property into another type of asset.
 So here is an important equation. equation, this is useful life is equal to the value of an asset divided by the cost to maintain  that asset. If you’re looking for the useful life of your money in an asset, then the way to figure  it out is ask, how much does it cost every year to maintain that asset in pristine condition?  year to maintain that asset in pristine condition. What do I have to spend in order to avoid depreciation or decay? It turns out that that L, that useful life, is very close to something we
 know in the Bitcoin community is stock to flow. They’re very related if you’re measuring them in  years. Many individuals and most corporations, they use financial assets to preserve capital.  And this is the source of a challenge for us. Let’s talk about financial assets. I want to  keep my money for a long period of time.
 Start with a billion dollars, put it in the peso,  and the money is decaying in two years, right?  And 98% inflation rate strips you of your economic energy or your capital. This is not  a good long-duration asset. The Turkish lira, your capital lasts three years. The U.S. dollar,  under traditional monetary inflation for the past century, might last  14 years, but it’s not like you have it for 14 years.
 The life is being sucked out of you linearly over the 14 years.  Put your money in a hedge fund, what’s the annual cost?  It’s 2% management fee and then 20% of the upside, about 4% a year if you’re investing in normal assets.  That means it’s a 25-year asset.  Treasuries, you’re going to get a yield, but the 3.5% after-tax yield goes against the 7% monetary inflation.
 Maybe your money lasts 30 years.  yield goes against the 7% monetary inflation, maybe your money lasts 30 years. Capital in a mutual fund where you pay a 1% fee, 100 years. That’s about the best you’re going to get.  If you manage to buy a diversified portfolio at 10 basis points, the counterparty risk is going  to drive you to a 1% cost. So those are your financial assets.
 We’re running the world on  a 20th century set of ideas, and on average, your financial  assets are going to last you 30 years.  We all know inflation dilutes the value of financial assets, but inflation is just the  tip of the iceberg.  You’re also going to get diluted by tariffs and tolls and torts and transfers, taxes.  We got all sorts of taxes, income tax, capital gains tax.
 Every time you vibrate and move the money, you get taxed on the money.  And then if the taxes don’t take you and the torts don’t undo you, you’ve got weather and  competition and obsolescence and politics, catastrophe.  Those are the things that dilute the value of your capital over time.  And if you want to maintain economic energy, you have to fight against that friction.
 Well, most people realize that’s a frustrating endeavor and it’s a no-win endeavor. So they give up on financial assets and they start turning to physical assets to preserve capital. Well, here’s the physical asset, a Ferrari. Not a good way to  keep your money forever though, because after five years you’ve spent as much on the insurance and  the upkeep and the depreciation as it’s worth. Yachts aren’t much better.
 If you spend 10% of  your money operating it, you also get hit with depreciation. Don’t store your money in yachts.  A home in Miami Beach, if you buy a $10 million house, you better come up with $10 million to  maintain the house over 17 years. Now you’ve got no money left. Silver? 22 years. A warehouse? 40 years, maybe 50 years.
 Bar of gold? 62 years. A painting? 72 years. Land? The average property tax in the United States is  1.1 percent. That means your money is going to last 91 years. Unless the government reassesses the  value of your property, then it’s going to last less than 91 years. The oldest family ranch in  the United States is King Ranch. They made it 173 years. Every other family in the country failed.
 And here’s the longest held property, the crown estate in the United Kingdom.  You could say the royal family held it since 1066, but on the other hand, it passed from the  Plantagenets to the Stuarts through the Lancasters and the Yorks and eventually found its way to the  Hanover family. And so maybe seven different families split that.
 None of them got to take it with them. So physical assets, you might think, might last a thousand  years. Probably about 50 to 75 years is the best you’re going to do. Entropy is diluting the value  of your physical assets. It’s sucking the capital, the energy out of them.
 There’s a reason it’s called  earth and not heaven. Because politicians are very creative. They got a city tax, a county tax,  a state tax, a federal tax, a transfer tax, a usage tax on the property. And if that doesn’t  get you, there’s rent control, price control, or a culture shock.  Then you’ve got competition.  You might get discriminated against.
 There’s recession.  The currency can collapse.  Your tenants won’t pay you.  Someone will slip and fall on the front sidewalk and sue you.  There’s weather, war, crime, and catastrophe.  And if energy prices go through the roof, it’s going to be hard for you to make a go of it. Physical capital is not a simple solution.
 Something I learned at MIT,  the three laws of thermodynamics, you can’t win. You can’t break even.  win. You can’t break even, but you can’t get out of the game. So you could stop right here and be a little bit depressed, but then again, we don’t want to lose. So you start thinking,  what if we could find a way out of the game? Then we could break even. And he went away.
 And that’s Bitcoin.  Bitcoin is digital capital.  That’s what he created.  Bitcoin’s immortal, immutable, and immaterial capital. And I use that in this sense. It’s  got an infinite lifespan. It’s not being attacked by the forces of weather and entropy and inflation.  It’s immaterial in the sense that it’s not in the physical world, it’s not suffering from all  of those parade of horribles that are the scourge of financial and physical assets.
 And it is the solution to our economic dilemma. The transformation of our capital from financial  and physical assets to digital assets, it solves the problem that we’re all facing. Now, how long-lived is  Bitcoin? Well, take your Bitcoin and put it at scale with a custodian, an institutional-grade  custodian. You pay 10 basis points.
 You know, by the first law of money, that means you’re  going to last a thousand years. The custodian might not  last a thousand years, but that doesn’t matter because you can move the Bitcoin every year  or every decade, and you can stay one step ahead of the custodian’s failing. You can’t  teleport a building. You can’t teleport the King Ranch, you know? And so Bitcoin is that thing that you can move.
 Say you custody your Bitcoin.  You can self-custody your Bitcoin for about one basis point a year,  assuming you buy good hardware wallets and signing devices  and spend a day a year to keep track of it.  Now you’ve got a 10,000-year asset.  And what happens if you give it to the AI?  Well, an AI or a computer program can maintain those private keys for the cost of electricity.
 You’ve got a 100,000 year asset. The AIs are going to want the Bitcoin. If they have a choice between owning the Bitcoin and owning the ranch in  Texas or owning the bar of gold or owning the Argentine peso, it’s pretty obvious what  they’re going to want, and you can see here why they’re going to want it.
 Digital assets are in a class all their own.  When you compare them to all the other assets that you can use for capital preservation,  you can see they’re off the scale.  Everything else is living in the domain of 30, 40, 50 years, and you’re in the domain  of 1,000 to 100,000 years.  It’s a breakthrough in capital preservation, but it makes it a revolution in economics.
 If you would be rich,  trade wisely. And here’s a very simple principle. Trade temporary for permanent.  Trade your ice cream cone that’s melting for the peso, the peso for the dollar, the dollar for the  land, and the land for the Bitcoin.  Trade the currency for capital.  Trade something fragile for something resilient.  Trade something local for something global.
 Trade something physical for something digital.  Trade the security for the commodity.  Trade the commodity for the scarcity.  You can’t go wrong moving in that direction.  So let’s talk about some great trades in history, some trillion-dollar trades.  The Dutch understood naval power.  They understood ships.
 They had thousands of them. They bought the best port in the New World for a couple of hundred dollars in plastic and textile trinkets.  for a couple of hundred dollars in plastic and textile trinkets.  And that’s worth two and a half trillion dollars today.  Okay?  It was an investment that’s returned 6% for 398 years straight.
 It’s a 10.5 billion X return.  And if you think about it, you’re like, why would I actually give up the best port in  America for a bunch of textiles and plastic and glass? But the people that sold the thing to them  didn’t understand naval power.
 If you don’t appreciate the reason you’re going to want the  property, you won’t value the property. Napoleon wanted to gallivant across the old world, and Jefferson wanted to expand in the  new world.  So France sells Louisiana to the U.S. for $15 million in 1803.  The $15 million probably lasted a few months fueling the French army.  It’s gone.  Jefferson got that.
 He got 27% of the United States. It’s an 800,000x return worth  12 trillion or more. It’ll be worth more. Jefferson had some vision, as did this man.  Seward paid $7 million for Alaska two years after the country was decimated by the Civil War.  John D. Rockefeller was trying to start an oil company.  Today, there’s a trillion dollars of oil underneath Alaska.
 It’s a massive return for a piece of paper.  How much is digital capital worth?  Take the $450 trillion multiplied by 3%.  That’s your entropy cost or your inflation cost.  It costs the world $13.5 billion a year to take all of those parade of horribles  when they’re trying to preserve their wealth.  If you put a 20 P to E on it, like you’d value a company or a long duration bond, that’s  worth $270 trillion.
 So digital capital is worth 10, 20, 15 trillion a year, and it’s worth hundreds  of trillions of dollars. Reality check. Is he full of BS? Well, digital capital is returning 55% for the past four years. Financial capital,  the best in the world, is the bond. It’s minus 5%. Imagine capitalizing your company or your  country on a minus 5% instead of a plus 55%. It’s obviously working. And now let’s come back to my chart here.
 Global wealth, we can look at  it like this, and we see the little Bitcoin, you know, square in the left corner. But what’s  happening? Here’s my macro Bitcoin forecast. It’s 21 years. Goes out to the year 2045. What do I think will happen? Well,  I’ve got a bear case and a bull case, but what I think will happen is that 55% ARR goes to 50%,  45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20. It’s between 50 and 20. It’ll gradually decelerate till it’s growing about twice as fast as the S&P index.
 And at that rate, Bitcoin’s $13 million a coin in the year 2045.  $13 million. It could be a $3 million bear case. It could be a $49 million bull case. But  what is Bitcoin? 7% of the world’s assets then. What about the rest of the assets?  Well, I actually think that AIs and technology are going to revolutionize tech.
 We had no  companies worth a trillion, then we had a bunch of trillion dollar companies.  You’re going to see more because you’re going to see companies with 100,000 AIs and no employees,  and they’re going to do the work of companies that used to have 100,000 employees.  You’re going to see megacorps develop, you know,  shipping robots and self-driving cars  and a company that gives a personal physician to a billion people  without any doctors on the payroll.
 So clearly, equity is going to grow fast.  Gold is going to get demonetized.  Land will be less monetized.  But look, here’s the future in 2045.  It doesn’t look that revolutionary.  It looks like today.  It’s just that Bitcoin is visible on the chart to you.  When Bitcoin is visible, that’s going to be the base case.
 Now, what are the implications of this?  How do you make money?  Well, let’s talk about individual Bitcoin strategy.  What should you do?  Make Bitcoin your primary treasury asset, convert your excess earnings to Bitcoin, utilize  subsidized credit if the government will loan you money, borrow the money  at cheap rates and buy Bitcoin and find a tax-efficient way to invest the Bitcoin.
 What  shouldn’t you do? Don’t quit your day job. Don’t lose your focus on Bitcoin. Don’t use margin loans  and trade with leverage. You get wiped out while you’re asleep  on a Saturday night. That’s not good. Good, 30-year loan for 3% backed by the government  on your land. Bad, overnight 10x leverage.
 So what’s a typical person? Well, we actually model  an individual, and we said, what if you had $750,000 in net assets,  and you made $200,000 a year, and you’re going to make 5% more every year,  and you’ve got a savings rate of 25%, and you can invest $50,000 a year?  Well, there’s a lot of strategies.  You can be the normie and do a normal strategy, diversified portfolio.
 You can be a 10 percenter and you can put 10 percent of your assets into Bitcoin.  You can be a BTC maxi and put 80 percent of your assets and put 80 percent of your earnings  into Bitcoin.  You could be a double maxi and that’s when you basically take an extra $250,000 loan  against the house  and then the triple maxi is  you finance the house for Bitcoin  you buy Bitcoin  you flip all your assets to Bitcoin  and then you move to a cheap tax jurisdiction  where you actually can avoid some taxes  and invest an extra 50 grand in Bitcoin,
 maybe a Singapore, UAE, or something.  What’s the result?  Well, this is the result.  The normie ends up with $8 million in 21 years.  The 10 percenter will more than double that.  The maxi ends up with $100 million.  The double maxi, $150 million. The double maxi, 150. The triple maxi,  214 million. You can see the power of leverage, and the choice is yours.
 And you can also see, you know, it takes 15.9 Bitcoin to be a triple maxi.  You know, 6.25 Bitcoin will make you a wealthy person. Let’s talk  about corporations. Dues. Convert your capital to BTC. Convert your cash flows to BTC. Issue  equity to buy BTC when it’s accretive. Issue debt to buy BTC when it’s accretive. Issue debt by BTC when it’s accretive. Don’ts.
 Don’t bleed your capital  with taxable dividends. Don’t surrender your capital with stock buybacks.  Don’t dilute your shareholders with risky overpriced M&A activity.  Here’s our typical corporation. $100 million of cash flow, $1 billion of enterprise value.  It’s growing.  It’s generating a lot of cash flow.  Its share price is $100.
 And now the issue is, what’s your strategy?  Normie, maxi, double maxi, triple maxi?  Well, the normie is going to be okay. You’ll have a $1,200 stock price, but just 10% allocation doubles it.  The maxi is going to nearly 8x it.  The double maxi is $17,000 stock.  The triple maxi is $28,000.  What kind of company do you want to run?  Reality check.
 This is a triple maxi strategy at work right now.  This is micro strategy.  It will be 48 months on August 10th of this year since we started down this road.  48 months.  And, you know, if you’re running a company, and there’s 300 million companies out there,  if you’re running a company and you think you can do what Microsoft and Apple and Google do,  then good for you.
 You can get to a 20 20 to 25% ARR.  If you want to copy NVIDIA, you will beat everybody. But I think that right now in the boardrooms of Microsoft and Apple and Google and Tesla, they’re stressed out about copying NVIDIA.  And the irony is, it’s easy to copy MicroStrategy.  I just gave you the playbook.
 It’s simple.  This is how it compounds over four years.  Four years of doing that gets you to a 1300% improvement.  So bottom line, build a strong capital structure,  avoid dilutive financial practices.  Let’s talk about an institution.  You got a church, a charity, an endowment of Harvard, you know, any non-profit.
 What should you do?  Modify your charter to invest in BTC.  Reallocate from short-term duration assets to long-duration assets.  You know, you wouldn’t invest in ice cream cones.  Don’t invest in the peso, but why are you holding 20-year financial instruments?  Don’t own 50-year physical land instruments.
 Buy a 1,000-year instrument.  Use BTC.  BTC is the cost of capital, not the S&P.  The S&P is 13%.  BTC is 55%, right?  Think of 55%. That’s your cost of capital. And then use intelligent  leverage. Okay, here’s our model, a billion-dollar portfolio. You want to be a normie, a maxi,  a triple maxi. Here, at the maxi, we just said put 100% in at the double maxi, and triple maxi is take 10% leverage.
 And that’s what happens.  You start with a billion dollars, and in 21 years,  you’ll have $5 billion of your enormity,  and you’ll be patting yourself on the back talking about  what a good job you’ve done managing the endowment.  But it could have been $300 billion.  It could have been 100x. It could have been 100x.
 Not that hard, very straightforward.  Now let’s talk about wealth of nations.  This is the interesting one.  What’s the national Bitcoin strategy?  Do’s and don’ts.  Well, reallocate your treasury from gold and bonds, their short duration assets,  to a 10,000 year asset. Issue currency to buy Bitcoin. Issue debt to buy the Bitcoin.
 Encourage  Bitcoin ownership with favorable laws. Protect self-custody for individuals and corporations.  protect self-custody for individuals and corporations,  and support integration with the banking system of your country.  Those are all do’s.  The don’t, don’t pursue policies hostile to Bitcoin and Bitcoin holders.
 This one’s not complicated.  Now, let’s say you’re an indebted country.  You’re actually in debt.  You’re running a deficit.  I could name these countries, but I won’t.  I’m just going to say you owe a lot of money, and you’re struggling.  Your interest rates are high, and you don’t know what to do.  Well, here’s your strategies.
 Are you a normie or a 10 percenter or a maxi, double maxi, or triple maxi? The maxi is you put a third of your treasury  into this. A double maxi is 65 percent. And a triple maxi is put all your treasury into it and  start issuing debt. For those of you who can actually read, right, the subtext of this  is the first country to buy Bitcoin by issuing its own currency wins. This is simple. You print paper.  Remember that sewer check? You issue the check.
 They’d be like, well, yeah, you could whine.  Oh, we couldn’t afford it.  It was two years after the Civil War.  The country was bankrupt.  Millions of people are dead.  The South is in disrepair.  The North is angry.  And this guy, Seward, comes up with an idea to buy frozen tundra, a lot of it, from a bunch of Russians that wanted the paper.
 Okay, so people have done things under worse situations.  But you can see here the normie strategy is you owe $3 trillion.  You’re not getting anywhere.  The maxi strategy pays off your debt.  The double maxi strategy makes you rich. The triple maxi strategy  makes you very rich.
 Why? Because you’re buying the property that everybody is running to in a  hundred years, and you just go buy it now. Like, standard oil was nothing. There was no gasoline. There were no automobiles. We had no diesel locomotives in 1867.  We invented all that stuff, but common sense says, oh, I can buy something that’s equal to about one-fifth of the size of the nation for a few dollars.
 Why don’t I just grab it?  Bitcoin strategy for wealthy foreign countries.  Let’s say you have a lot of money. You know, maybe you’re Saudi Arabia or Norway’s say you have a lot of money.  You know, maybe you’re Saudi Arabia or Norway,  and you make a lot of money.  Well, what’s your strategy?  You want to be a normie, a maxi, a double maxi?  A maxi puts 25% of their money into Bitcoin.
 A triple maxi goes 75%  and converts their surpluses into Bitcoin.  Here’s what happens. You just get insanely rich. $58 trillion of rich. But, you know,  more than that, this strengthens your national security because you end up with $50 trillion  or more of digital capital nobody can take.
 You know, they can’t steal it, right?  They bomb your country. They invade your border. They’re not getting the Bitcoin,  right? So this is good for your financial security and your national security.  But note, if you are Saudi Arabia or Norway, and if you pursue the triple maxi strategy,  Saylor says it’s very easy to do, but it’s 4.
2 million Bitcoin you end up with at the end of  that line. That means there’s not a lot of room for triple maxis, not at the nation state level,  right? There’s going to be one, there might be two. At some point,  right, this is an opportunity for an aggressive mover. You can have a lot of triple maxi families  and a lot of triple maxi corporations, not a lot of room for triple maxi nations.
 And let’s look at the U.S. U.S. is a special case. Well, the rules are still the same, right?  Buy Bitcoin, sell the paper, get rid of your gold, go long range.  And the don’ts are still the same.  Don’t harass the Bitcoiners.  Don’t send the industry overseas.  Don’t send the capital overseas.  But what’s our base case here?  Well, you know, we think that AI and new technology is going to drive growth.
 I mean, you know, I’m going to assume that the United States is going to be run by competent executives,  and they’re going to harness technology, and we’re going to actually take advantage of AI, and we’re going to create robot cars and robots and, you know, billion-person websites  that give you free accounting and legal and medical advice, and all that’s going to grow  our revenues faster than it grows our expenses, and we’ll eventually get to the point where  interest rates come down. But the question is, what’s the United States Bitcoin strategy?
 And we could be normies.  You could be a 10%-er.  That’s kind of like buying 500,000 Bitcoin.  You could buy a million Bitcoin.  A double maxi is 2 million Bitcoin.  A triple maxi is buy 4 million Bitcoin.  And then start sweeping the surplus of the nation when it  comes into Bitcoin.
 And the consequences? Well, if you’re a normie, you know, if you’re a normie  and you have great productivity growth and brilliant technology and the robots do all the  work for us, you’re still going to be in debt. It just won’t get much worse. I mean, that’ll save us. We need  that. If you’re a maxi, you’ll pay off half the debt. If you’re a double maxi, you got a surplus.  And if you’re a triple maxi, instead of owing 30 trillion, the nation has 30 trillion,  right? Bitcoin is not the solution to all our problems.
 Bitcoin is not the solution to all our problems. It is the solution to half our problems.  And the important point is the other half are very complicated.  They’ll take a lot of people and energy.  This half is simple.  This is a very simple thing to solve half our problems.  So Bitcoin is cyber Manhattan.
 Hundreds of trillions of dollars of capital are going to go there.  We’re going to demonetize Russian tundra and Chinese real estate and everything in Africa  and all of the crappy buildings, everything anybody bought that they didn’t need, it’s  getting demonetized.  You buy a Bitcoin, you owe a building, otherwise a boulevard, otherwise the entire neighborhood.
 It’s only 276 to the third.  That’s what you’re looking at right now.  And I’m going to leave you with one quote.  Satoshi Nakamoto kicked off the Bitcoin network January 3rd, 2009. On January 17th of 2009, 14 days later,  16 months before pizza day, when Bitcoin was worth nothing and it was not going to be worth  anything for a year, Satoshi Nakamoto said it might make sense just to get some in case it  catches on.
 If enough people think the same way, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.  And never have wiser words been spoken.  You’re staring at a trillion dollars of proof, but there’s still thousand X to come, and  you have a lot more information at your fingertips, the writing is on the  wall.  Bitcoin is the future of capital, it’s the future of money.
 It might make sense to get some because it has caught on.  Thank you.  Welcome Michael.  The Bitcoin Conference.  We started with a dream to build a community focused on Bitcoin.  It all started in 2019 in the heart of San Francisco, the first major Bitcoin conference in years that kickstarted a revolution.
 And then Miami, a place where enthusiasts, developers, dreamers and innovators could come together to make Bitcoin better.  It has been an amazing five years and eight conferences, thanks to all of you.  Bitcoin Conference has become the largest premier global Bitcoin gathering in the world,  leading hyper-Bitcoinization.
 While Miami was incredible, it was time to set the stage for Bitcoin in a new city.  So we took the conference on the road.  Nashville, Tennessee was the obvious choice, a city known for music and freedom.  Next year, the conference is hitting the road again in search of the next global stage.  We are headed to a new city next year.
 With hyper-Bitcoinization right around the corner, we have no plans to take the foot off the gas.  Find out where we are headed next, scan the QR code, and be at the main stage for the big announcement.