Curriculum
Course: Money
Login

Curriculum

Money

Video lesson

Twins Who Own The Bitcoin

Winklevoss Twins Legacy: From Social Networks to DeFi

From Facebook Fame to Cryptocurrency Fame

Bitcoin Billionaires: A Lesson in Resilience and Risk

In the fast-paced world of tech and finance, where fortunes are made and lost in the blink of an eye, few stories are as compelling as the rise of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. Once branded as mere footnotes in the history of Facebook, the Winklevoss twins have successfully reshaped their narrative, transforming from social media outcasts to pioneers in the cryptocurrency space. Their journey is not just a tale of revenge, redemption, and wealth—it’s a microcosm of the larger revolution cryptocurrencies promise in the financial world.

But how did they go from courtroom drama with Mark Zuckerberg to owning 1% of all Bitcoin? This lesson unpacks their path to crypto fame, exploring both the unique challenges they faced and the broader implications for decentralized finance. Through this critical analysis, we will see how the Winklevoss story intersects with the wider trends of blockchain and the transformative potential of Bitcoin. Buckle up: there’s a lot more to this than meets the eye.


Bitcoin Billionaires

The story of the Winklevoss twins’ Bitcoin journey begins, ironically, with Facebook. After a high-profile lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg—who they accused of stealing their idea for a social network—the twins walked away with $65 million. Yet, their initial wealth didn’t earn them respect in Silicon Valley. Instead, their association with Zuckerberg made them social pariahs in the tech world. That is, until they stumbled upon Bitcoin during a fateful trip to Ibiza in 2012.

Introduced to the cryptocurrency by an eager entrepreneur, the twins immediately saw Bitcoin’s potential as a “digital gold,” a decentralized currency free from government control and banking institutions. This realization led to their significant investment, where they ended up buying 1% of all Bitcoin in existence. The twins didn’t stop there. They founded Gemini, a regulated cryptocurrency exchange, and became outspoken advocates for bringing Bitcoin into the mainstream financial ecosystem.

At its core, the lesson highlights the twins’ persistence in proving their worth beyond the lawsuit, their calculated risk in embracing an unproven technology, and their role in shaping the future of cryptocurrency.


Critical Analysis

Strength 1: Recognizing Bitcoin’s Potential Early On

One of the video’s most compelling points is how the Winklevoss twins recognized Bitcoin’s potential before the rest of the world. At a time when Bitcoin was associated with illicit activities on platforms like Silk Road, they saw beyond its dark reputation, understanding its capacity as a store of value. Drawing parallels between Bitcoin and gold, they recognized the advantages of a decentralized currency that governments couldn’t inflate by simply printing more of it.

This foresight is particularly impressive when considering how little institutional support there was for Bitcoin at the time. While traditional financial institutions were skeptical, the twins’ willingness to bet big on this unregulated, decentralized currency set them apart from their peers. Their decision mirrors other major shifts in technology adoption, where early believers (like those in the internet’s infancy) reaped the rewards for their risk tolerance.

Strength 2: Embracing Regulation in the Wild West of Crypto

Another strong point is the twins’ focus on bringing regulatory compliance to the crypto world, a stance that set them apart from many early Bitcoin adopters. Founding Gemini, a highly regulated exchange, was a pivotal moment in legitimizing cryptocurrency. While many in the early crypto space were anarchistic in their resistance to regulation, the Winklevoss twins understood that for Bitcoin to reach mainstream acceptance, it needed to operate within existing financial frameworks.

This stance continues to be relevant as the crypto space grapples with legal uncertainties. Their push for “smart regulation” suggests that cryptocurrencies don’t have to be lawless to maintain their core values. In fact, regulation might be the key to bridging the gap between crypto and traditional finance, bringing in institutional investors who would otherwise shy away from the volatility and risk.

Weakness 1: Bitcoin’s Volatility and Mainstream Adoption

While the twins have successfully promoted Bitcoin as a store of value, the video glosses over Bitcoin’s inherent volatility, which continues to be a major barrier to its widespread use as a currency. For all its advantages, Bitcoin’s price swings can be extreme, which makes it a risky asset for those who aren’t comfortable with high-risk investments. This volatility raises questions about whether Bitcoin can truly replace traditional currencies or if it will remain a speculative asset.

A more nuanced discussion could address these risks and explore alternative cryptocurrencies designed to be more stable, such as stablecoins. While Bitcoin is often hailed as the king of crypto, its volatility remains a serious concern for those looking for reliable, everyday use cases.

Weakness 2: The Twins’ Privileged Position in Crypto

While the Winklevoss twins’ success in Bitcoin is undeniable, it’s important to consider how their story is shaped by privilege. The twins had access to significant financial resources from their Facebook settlement, allowing them to invest large sums in Bitcoin at a time when most people couldn’t afford to take such a risk. The video lightly touches on this but doesn’t fully acknowledge how wealth and access have played a role in their crypto success.

This doesn’t negate their foresight or accomplishments, but it does raise questions about accessibility in the crypto world. As the CFIRE program highlights, cryptocurrencies offer opportunities for financial inclusion, yet the most significant gains in crypto often go to those who can afford to invest heavily early on.


Connections to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain

The Winklevoss twins’ story is deeply intertwined with the broader development of the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Their journey from tech outcasts to Bitcoin billionaires highlights many of the principles at the core of blockchain technology: decentralization, the potential for financial freedom, and the disruptive nature of innovation.

Their founding of Gemini, for instance, reflects the challenges of merging crypto’s decentralized ethos with the regulatory frameworks of traditional finance. This tension is at the heart of ongoing debates within the crypto community. On the one hand, decentralization promises freedom from centralized control, but on the other, lack of regulation can lead to fraud, scams, and instability. The twins’ advocacy for regulated exchanges shows how the crypto world can evolve to meet both goals: maintaining decentralization while ensuring security and transparency for users.

Furthermore, their early investment in Bitcoin underscores the role of risk-taking in crypto success. Much like early-stage venture capital, investing in emerging cryptocurrencies requires vision, patience, and an appetite for risk. For CFIRE learners, this lesson demonstrates the importance of identifying disruptive technologies early, making informed investment decisions, and understanding the underlying principles of blockchain that drive these innovations.


Broader Implications and Future Outlook

The Winklevoss twins’ story speaks to the broader societal shift from centralized, government-controlled financial systems to decentralized, peer-to-peer networks. As cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology continue to evolve, they have the potential to upend traditional banking systems, making financial services more accessible to people worldwide. This democratization of finance could reduce the need for intermediaries, giving individuals more control over their wealth.

However, there are still significant hurdles to overcome. Issues such as Bitcoin’s volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and scalability challenges need to be addressed before cryptocurrencies can fully realize their potential. That said, the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) is already showing how blockchain can create new financial systems that are open, transparent, and resistant to censorship.

Looking ahead, it’s clear that blockchain’s impact will extend beyond finance. The growing interest in Web3, where users have more control over their data and online interactions, represents a shift towards decentralizing not just money, but the internet itself. The Winklevoss twins’ move into NFT marketplaces and their support for Web3 projects indicates they believe this is the future of technology—a belief that many in the crypto space share.


Personal Commentary and Insights

Having worked in both the tech and financial sectors, I see the Winklevoss twins’ journey as emblematic of the broader shifts happening in our world today. Their ability to pivot from their Facebook defeat to becoming Bitcoin pioneers shows the importance of resilience in a rapidly changing landscape. The lesson for CFIRE students is clear: staying adaptable, informed, and willing to take calculated risks can open doors to opportunities that others might miss.

The idea of Bitcoin as “digital gold” resonates deeply with me. In traditional finance, we’ve long relied on gold as a hedge against inflation and economic uncertainty. Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and fixed supply make it a powerful alternative, especially in a world where governments continue to print money and devalue their currencies.

But while the Winklevoss twins’ success is inspiring, we must also acknowledge the barriers to entry in the crypto space. Not everyone has the capital to invest millions in a nascent technology, and that’s something we need to address as the ecosystem matures. Blockchain has the potential to democratize finance, but only if we ensure it remains accessible to all.


Conclusion

The Winklevoss twins’ rise to Bitcoin billionaires is not just a story of wealth—it’s a lesson in vision, resilience, and the power of disruptive technology. As we continue to explore the transformative potential of cryptocurrencies and blockchain, their journey offers valuable insights for those looking to understand and navigate the crypto ecosystem.

For CFIRE learners, the key takeaway is this: the world of finance is changing, and those who are willing to embrace that change—whether by investing in Bitcoin or diving into blockchain technologies—are the ones who will shape the future. Stay curious, stay informed, and most importantly, stay ahead of the curve.

Quotes

  1. “In a world where governments continue to print money and devalue their currencies, Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and fixed supply make it a powerful alternative.”
  2. “Their decision to embrace Bitcoin during its early, controversial years set the twins apart—not just as investors, but as visionaries.”
  3. “Blockchain has the potential to democratize finance, but only if we ensure it remains accessible to all.”

This lesson fits perfectly into the CFIRE training program as it emphasizes the critical thinking, resilience, and forward-thinking mindset necessary to navigate and succeed in the cryptocurrency world. 

 

 

 

The Winklevoss Twins and the Rise of Bitcoin:

A Story of Revolution, Redemption, and the Power of Digital Currency

This lesson covers the fascinating journey of the Winklevoss twins, once known primarily for their legal battles with Mark Zuckerberg over Facebook’s creation, and their transformation into major players in the cryptocurrency world. We’ll explore how they went from a tarnished reputation to becoming Bitcoin billionaires by recognizing the revolutionary potential of Bitcoin early on. Their story intertwines traditional finance principles with the disruptive power of cryptocurrency, offering insights into how decentralized money could reshape our world. By the end, you’ll understand how these foundational concepts fit into the broader context of the CryptoIsFire (CFIRE) training plan.


Core Concepts

  1. Bitcoin

    • Traditional Finance: A form of digital currency that operates independently of central banks.
    • Crypto Application: Bitcoin is a decentralized currency with a fixed supply of 21 million coins, offering a hedge against inflation.
    • Importance: Bitcoin represents the core concept of decentralization in the crypto world, disrupting traditional banking systems.
  2. Decentralization

    • Traditional Finance: Centralized institutions like banks manage all transactions.
    • Crypto Application: In cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, there’s no central authority. Instead, the network of users validates transactions.
    • Importance: Understanding decentralization helps newcomers grasp why crypto challenges the very foundation of traditional finance.
  3. Blockchain

    • Traditional Finance: A record-keeping method used by banks, often opaque and controlled by a few entities.
    • Crypto Application: Blockchain is an open, decentralized ledger that records all transactions and is fundamental to how cryptocurrencies operate.
    • Importance: Blockchain ensures transparency, security, and immutability, key principles for building trust in a decentralized system.
  4. Store of Value

    • Traditional Finance: Gold or other precious metals that retain value over time.
    • Crypto Application: Bitcoin is often compared to “digital gold,” acting as a store of value in the crypto world.
    • Importance: Grasping this concept helps learners understand why many view Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and economic instability.
  5. Angel Investment

    • Traditional Finance: High-net-worth individuals who invest in startups in exchange for equity.
    • Crypto Application: The Winklevoss twins used their wealth to invest in early-stage crypto projects like BitInstant.
    • Importance: Early investments in the right crypto projects can yield exponential returns, showcasing the opportunities for wealth-building in the crypto space.

Key Sections

1. From Facebook to Bitcoin: The Winklevoss Twins’ Transformation

  • Key Points:
    • The twins’ early involvement in Facebook.
    • Their transition to Bitcoin after a legal battle with Zuckerberg.
    • The decision to embrace Bitcoin during its early, controversial years.
  • Detailed Explanation: After the infamous Facebook lawsuit, the Winklevoss twins were left with a tarnished reputation but substantial wealth. Instead of retreating, they turned to Silicon Valley, seeking redemption. Their introduction to Bitcoin in Ibiza set them on a path to revolutionize their legacy, moving from social networks to the future of decentralized finance.
  • Crypto Connection: This section illustrates how early adopters in crypto, like the Winklevoss twins, took calculated risks, positioning themselves to benefit from Bitcoin’s rising prominence. It also highlights how personal setbacks can be a catalyst for greater success in the crypto world.

2. Bitcoin: Digital Gold or Passing Fad?

  • Key Points:
    • Bitcoin’s properties as a store of value.
    • The finite supply of 21 million coins.
    • Comparison to gold as a historical store of value.
  • Detailed Explanation: The twins quickly realized that Bitcoin shared many characteristics with gold—durability, scarcity, and portability. However, Bitcoin’s digital nature made it easier to transfer and subdivide, presenting a modern alternative to traditional stores of value like gold.
  • Crypto Connection: For newcomers, understanding the “digital gold” analogy is crucial to appreciating Bitcoin’s value proposition as an asset that could potentially replace gold in the global financial system. Bitcoin’s finite supply makes it resistant to inflation, something traditional currencies can’t offer.

3. Decentralization: The Power Shift in Finance

  • Key Points:
    • Bitcoin’s decentralized nature.
    • Lack of reliance on banks or financial intermediaries.
    • The role of peer-to-peer transactions.
  • Detailed Explanation: Unlike traditional finance, where banks and governments control monetary supply and transaction validation, Bitcoin’s decentralization cuts out these middlemen. This concept not only allows for faster, cheaper transactions but also gives individuals more control over their financial assets.
  • Crypto Connection: Decentralization is one of the core tenets of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. By removing intermediaries, crypto empowers users and reduces the risks of centralized financial failures, as seen in the Cyprus banking crisis.

4. The Rise and Fall of BitInstant

  • Key Points:
    • The Winklevoss twins’ early investment in BitInstant.
    • The company’s growth as a Bitcoin exchange.
    • BitInstant’s downfall due to regulatory and legal issues.
  • Detailed Explanation: The Winklevoss twins’ early involvement with BitInstant highlights the potential and pitfalls of the emerging crypto market. BitInstant facilitated easier Bitcoin purchases but eventually collapsed under regulatory scrutiny. This story underscores the importance of compliance and regulation in crypto.
  • Crypto Connection: Understanding the challenges faced by early crypto companies like BitInstant helps newcomers appreciate why regulation is often necessary to protect investors and ensure the growth of the ecosystem.

Real-World Applications

The Winklevoss twins’ story is a case study in both the potential and risks of cryptocurrency investments. Their investment in Bitcoin was bold, happening at a time when most people saw it as a risky, fringe technology. The lesson here? In both traditional and crypto markets, timing and conviction are crucial. This concept extends to today, where the CFIRE program encourages students to explore emerging crypto assets while being mindful of the risks and market conditions.


Challenges and Solutions

  • Challenge: Early Bitcoin investors faced a stigma, with Bitcoin often associated with illegal activities.
    • Solution: The Winklevoss twins pushed for regulated exchanges like Gemini, helping legitimize Bitcoin.
  • Challenge: The volatile price of Bitcoin made it difficult to predict long-term value.
    • Solution: The twins saw Bitcoin as a long-term investment, choosing to “hodl” through ups and downs, a common strategy among crypto veterans.

Key Takeaways

  1. Bitcoin as Digital Gold: Bitcoin’s fixed supply makes it a valuable store of wealth, akin to gold.
  2. Decentralization is Key: Cryptocurrencies remove intermediaries, offering greater control over personal finances.
  3. Timing and Risk: Early adoption in both traditional and crypto markets can lead to immense rewards, but it requires understanding the risks.
  4. The Role of Regulation: As with BitInstant, regulatory compliance is essential to ensure long-term viability in the crypto space.
  5. Long-term Vision: The Winklevoss twins held onto their Bitcoin despite setbacks, showcasing the importance of having a long-term strategy in crypto.

Discussion Questions and Scenarios

  1. How does Bitcoin as a store of value compare to gold? Can it ever fully replace gold?
  2. How might decentralization in crypto benefit individuals in countries with unstable banking systems?
  3. What are the risks of early adoption in emerging technologies like Bitcoin?
  4. In what ways can crypto exchanges like Gemini bridge the gap between traditional finance and decentralized currencies?
  5. If you were in the Winklevoss twins’ position in 2012, would you have taken the risk of investing in Bitcoin? Why or why not?

Additional Resources

  • Books: “Bitcoin Billionaires” by Ben Mezrich provides deeper insights into the Winklevoss twins’ journey.
  • Tools: Check out Gemini for a beginner-friendly crypto exchange.

Glossary

  • Bitcoin: A decentralized digital currency without a central bank.
  • Blockchain: A decentralized ledger of transactions.
  • Decentralization: A system where control is distributed rather than centralized.
  • Store of Value: An asset that retains value over time, such as gold or Bitcoin.
  • Angel Investment: Wealthy individuals investing in startups for equity.

This lesson is just the beginning of your journey with the CryptoIsFire (CFIRE) training program. Keep pushing forward, and with each lesson, you’ll be closer to mastering the fascinating world of cryptocurrencies!

 

 

Read Video Transcript
How the Winklevoss twins’ crypto program failed 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoPCwH5Q6YM
Transcript:
 The chance of having identical twins is about 1 in 250.  The chance of those same twins going to Harvard,  being classmates with Mark Zuckerberg,  inspiring him to make Facebook,  later suing him for making Facebook,  parlaying their lawsuit money  into being some of the biggest cryptocurrency entrepreneurs  in the world,  starting a shitty cover band called Mars Junction,  and then getting sued by the Attorney General  for allegedly defrauding investors  through their cryptocurrency exchange.
 Well, the chances of all that happening,  unfortunately, aren’t zero.  Today, we examine the journey  of Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss.  So everybody, throw on your polos,  fire up your Range Rovers,  and get your wealth manager on the line.  It’s time to talk Winklevii.  We first became aware of Jay and crew over here after they were played by the famously chill Army Hammer in the 2010 bangin’ film The Social Network.
 The movie tells the story of how the twins sued Mark Zuckerberg for stealing the idea that became Facebook.  In real life, they received $65 million for the settlement, the majority of which was put into Facebook stock. That figure would then quickly balloon to over $600 million.  The settlement gave the Winklevay the opportunity  to do what every pair of hot, loaded siblings  dreams of doing, incest, invest, invest.
 In the years following their big Facebook settlement,  the twins launched their family office, Winklevoss Capital.  Their investments ranged from pretty normal to crazy shit like this company trying to  solve climate change by reviving the woolly mammoth. But in the early 2010s,  the Winkles made an investment that would be the fundamental building block  of their next chapter, Bitcoin.
 Somewhere around 2012, the Winkles started scooping  up bitcoins like they were Olympic sixth place medals. By the next year, the  brothers reportedly held 1% of all Bitcoins in circulation,  and pretty soon, it became their whole thing.  Every Bitcoin issue has never been a Bitcoin problem.  We believe Bitcoin disrupts gold.  If you own a Bitcoin today, you will be a millionaire.
 We eat, sleep, breathe Bitcoin  every single second of the day.  Soon they filed a proposal trying to create  the first US regulated crypto exchange,  a model that would allow everyday investors to trade crypto, kinda like how people trade stocks.  Eventually they launched their own exchange in October 2015.
 They called it…  Gemini.  The advantage of Gemini that the Winklevise said was that it was going to be this highly regulated exchange.  So it would be a differentiator because they would go in through the front door with regulators  and try and create this product that wouldn’t collapse  In a pile of flames and sadness.
 Aww, but I love piles of flames and sadness. Can I have one as a little treat?  Yes!  Gemini is also like put for this reputation of being  Someone who’s very highly regulated. The twins have called for regulation in the crypto industry  They are based in New York  where they’ve worked with regulators there.
 Leo Schwartz and Hannah Miller are two crypto reporters  who have written extensively about Gemini.  And we got them on the horn to explain  that while many early crypto moguls were anti-government,  Gemini’s tactic was to publicly cooperate with regulators  as much as possible.  But despite the Winkles growing personal fortune  by getting in early on Bitcoin,  they were literally becoming billionaires off of this shit, Gemini itself was being outpaced by  other exchanges, maybe because of Gemini’s focus on playing by the rules. But if I know anything
 about Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, it’s that they’re not gonna sit idly by while some fucking  nerd beats them at their own game. At least not again. and then those cryptocurrencies would be lent out to other partners and they would earn a yield back on that up to 8%.  So the Winkles had themselves a thinkle and decided to jack up Gemini  with a high-yield savings account like program they called Earn.
 You could promise customers, oh you’re gonna earn you know 8%  and not have to work at all for it.  You just put your money with us, we’ll invest it out, we’ll do all the messy math  and you’re gonna get money back.  And that’s way more attractive to people than, you know, a traditional savings account when  the interest on that is going to be incredibly low.
 When Gemini launched Earn in February 2021,  Tyler Winklevoss said that, quote, today’s investors know that a smart, diverse portfolio  includes crypto. It’s an investment in their future selves. Gemini also stressed that Earn  customers could redeem their crypto at any time. But the idea of a product like this wasn’t new  to crypto exchanges. A bunch of other companies had their own versions.
 And how did those go,  Hannah? There are several of these types of products available. Big names in crypto lending  include BlockFi and Celsius. Both these companies have filed for bankruptcy.  But Gemini was different, right?  They’re safe.  They got all these ads.  Now, who was Gemini lending their money out to?  So this is the slightly shady part,  is for Gemini, if you’re a Gemini Earn customer,  it wasn’t necessarily clear  how they were earning that yield.
 In reality, what was happening  is they were going behind the scenes  and giving all of the cryptocurrency to a  lending platform called Genesis. So the reality of Gemini’s Earn program was that it was really  more of a partnership between Gemini and another crypto lender, Genesis.
 Which we should say now  is not Gemini. There’s Gemini who we’ve been talking about and Genesis, whole new character we just welcomed. Different company sounds  the same. Gemini, Winkles. Genesis, other one. It’s not embarrassing. It’s okay to  be confused. I think kind of handing off you know maybe the messy bits to Genesis  was helpful you know the investment of the actual crypto you know getting the  interest like giving customers yield,  and Gemini kind of had the branding.
 But this arrangement wasn’t obvious.  The way that they presented the Gemini Earn  to their customers was that they were doing  these very sophisticated trades  to get back 8% yields for the investors.  In reality, what they were doing is they found  a single counterparty to give all the money to.  Shubhigalat is a software engineer  who says that he invested six figures into a Gemini Earn account in 2021.
 He claims  that he had no idea Gemini partnered with Genesis on the product. Whenever I received like their  marketing emails or like even in on their social media when they promoted Earn, they never mentioned  Genesis that we are partnering with Genesis for this program.  They do mention it in their terms and conditions.
 And obviously, that’s the fine print.  Ah, the fine print.  I know many a fine man who have been lost to the fine print.  Doug from the ski group, DraftKings took you too soon.  I’ll see you in hell.  Anyway, in marketing materials, Gemini tended to portray Genesis as a smaller part of the operation than they actually were.
 In an email promoting Earn from February 9th, 2021,  Gemini doesn’t mention Genesis until the last section subtitled, What are the risks? Where  they say that they’re, quote, partnering with accredited third-party borrowers, including  Genesis, who are vetted through a risk management framework. But despite all that talky talk,  it seems like Gemini and Genesis approach this whole risk management thing  pretty fast and loose.
 What Genesis was doing was lending nearly  all of the cryptocurrencies to two big players in crypto.  One of them is Alameda,  the failed trading firm for Sam Binkman Freed’s FTX,  and the other was Three Arrows Capital,  a hedge fund that also collapsed in spectacular fashion.  In summer 2022, following the unexpected collapse of a type of cryptocurrency called TerraUSD,  Three Arrows Capital, which was one of the most respected investing institutions in the industry,  suddenly went bankrupt. This had a catastrophic effect on its investors, including FTX,
 which Genesis had a lot of exposure to. But Gemini’s risk management framework should be  all over this, right?  Well, it turns out it kinda was.  According to legal documents,  months before Three Arrows went bankrupt,  Gemini had revised its internal estimate  of Genesis Capital’s credit rating from BBB,  which means investment grade, to CCC,  which means non-investment or junk grade.
 And as Three Arrows was collapsing in July 2022,  when advised of  Genesis’s financial condition, one Gemini board member even compared Genesis to Lehman Brothers  prior to its collapse. In fact, by late summer, it seemed like Gemini was getting ready to call  Genesis on their loans and end the Earn program to protect its customers.
 They actually withdrew  over $280 million from Genesis as a risk management measure.  At the time that the Winklevoss twins would  have been considering ending Earn,  the entire crypto industry was on edge.  But good goddammit, there is no quitting these guys.  You cannot spell Winklevoss with quit.  As Gemini became more aware of Genesis’s problems,  the Winklevoss twins met with Barry Silbert, the guy  who owns Genesis Capital.
 And more legal documents demonstrate that it was Silbert who helped convince them not to end the Earn program.  The general gist that we’ve gotten is that, you know, it was a lot of, I guess, like, you know,  don’t worry about it, like, easing of concerns that were there.  A couple months later, FTX’s sister trading firm Alameda Research, which at one point constituted 60% of Genesis’ dealbook,  famously followed three arrows  into Davy Jones’ crypto locker.
 At which point Genesis halted Gemini Earn Redemptions  freezing about a billion dollars from 200,000 Earn users,  including Shuby, who said that he was intending  on using that money to fund his wedding.  We were planning to get married,  and I thought we would have been married by now I guess.
 As soon as this thing blew  up it was like a like a nuclear bomb went off or something.” Shubhi also says that throughout the  summer of 2022 as crypto firms were collapsing Gemini didn’t warn Earn customers about increased  risk levels despite their internal investigations. Publicly a bunch of customers for Gemini Earn  saw major players in the space start to collapse like Three Arrows Capital and would reach out to investigations. collateralized and had a lot of risk because they were exposed to players like Three Hours Capital and they realized that this program would likely fail. They actually tried to cancel the agreement
 with Genesis before Genesis went bankrupt and started halting withdrawals. And in the meantime,  even though privately they were trying to end the program, they were still accepting deposits from  Gemini Earn customers. A couple months after Genesis froze withdrawals, the lawsuits started a rolling in.
 At the end of December 2022, investors in Gemini Earn filed a class action suit against  Gemini and the Winklevosses, which is ongoing.  And a couple weeks after that in January 2023, the SEC got in on the action, suing Gemini  and Genesis for selling unregistered securities, which Tyler called both disappointing and  super lame. Then later that month, Genesis Tyler called both disappointing and super lame.
 Then later that month, Genesis officially filed for bankruptcy, and Cameron Winklevoss  wrote an open letter to Genesis CEO Barry Silbert, accusing him of bad-faced stall tactics  that misled the Winklevii into keeping the Earn program running.  Which set off a flurry of lawsuits, open letters, and tweets between the Winklevii and Silbert,  basically accusing each other of being responsible for the lost billions of dollars of earned customer money that has continued  right up to today. My crypto twin kings love drama. It’s just been a series of lawsuits. It’s
 been very public spats on Twitter and it’s gotten really ugly for an industry that is already facing  so many troubles. All this hot action climaxed with the New York Attorney General suing Gemini,  Genesis, and Genesis’ parent company Digital Currency Group in October.  Which brings us to one of the defining questions of crypto in these last two years.
 Will people get their money back?  So the odds seem pretty good.  Genesis and Gemini have been going back and forth over bankruptcy agreements,  basically to make sure that money will get paid back to Gemini have been going back and forth over bankruptcy agreements basically to make  sure that money will get paid back to Gemini creditors.
 In different proposals, Gemini  customers have seen the potential money they could get back being as high as 100%.  So look, this story is pretty convoluted. Gemini, Genesis, DCG, Three Arrows, Winklevoss,  it’s really more terms than a YouTube video should have. But the story is not unique.  It’s one of the multiple cases in the crypto industry where people have lost a lot of money,  and they don’t know whether they’ll get it back.
 I talk to people who have been customers of multiple bankrupt platforms,  FTX, Celsius, BlockFi, and are just not sure if they’re going to recover their savings. So we don’t know what’s going to happen to the over a billion dollars  that’s currently frozen in the Gemini Earn program.
 Just like we don’t know what’s going  to happen with the crypto industry at large, which continues to ride a crazy roller coaster.  In the past few months, there have been severe regulatory actions, but also there’s talks of  an ETF being approved soon. The price of Bitcoin kind of looks promising. I don’t know. But what  we do know is how the Winklevii have handled situation so far on the one hand it seems like they tried to do all  this right they wanted to work with regulators and they registered gemini in new york so now  the new york attorney general can try to get the earned customers their money back but on the other
 hand they continued to take users money while they were ignoring the risks with genesis and kept  talking about how safe and secure their company was the entire time. And for all their talk about being knee deep in the trenches with the folks  that got screwed in this, they’re also doing shit like playing in their cover band days after they  lay off 10% of their staff.
 So it’s hard to tell how serious the Winklevii are about leading their  company and the crypto industry at large into the future. Matter of fact, these fellas got so much going on, it’s hard to tell what they’re about at  all.  Being the guys who stuck it to Zuck?  Being the guys who bring the woolly mammoth back to life?  Rock stars?  Olympians?  Just being famous?  I don’t know.
 But maybe they don’t either.  But damn if we don’t spend a weird amount of time talking about these guys.  Which is maybe what they want.  Oh God, is that what they’re about?  Hey folks, AI generated Dan here holding down the fort  while boss man is out hunting for treasure in Guadalajara.  I’m here to give you all a quick update  from our story today.
 On December 13th, Gemini emailed earned users asking for them to vote on a new proposed bankruptcy plan  that’s designed to distribute funds from the Genesis Chapter 11 proceedings.  And while this might sound like good news, many earned users aren’t happy with it  and are actually encouraging other users to vote against it.
 Probably because under this new plan, Gemini says that users can expect to recover between 61% and 100% of their earned balance. Which, you’ll notice, between 61 and 100% of their earned balance,  which you’ll notice is different from 100% of their earned balance. Users will vote on this  plan in the next couple of weeks, and if it passes, the bankruptcy court in the Southern  District of New York will make a decision on February 14th, which you might notice is  Valentine’s Day, or the day that I feverishly read bankruptcy filings while chained to a bottle of Adderall in my basement. Until next time, folks, love ya.