Curriculum
Course: Money
Login

Curriculum

Money

Video lesson

Recession Warnings

Recession Warnings: A Deep Dive into Yield Curves

Inverted Yield Curves: Signals, Risks

In the world of finance, few signals carry the weight of an inverted yield curve. It’s a term that has become synonymous with economic doom, and yet, in 2024, the world watches as the yield curve remains inverted, with markets seemingly unphased. Why does this matter, and what could it mean for investors—both traditional and crypto enthusiasts? The yield curve inversion, a time-tested predictor of recessions, has now stretched for over 530 days, raising questions about whether we’re witnessing a new economic paradigm or if history is merely biding its time. As we delve into this lesson, we’ll explore the deeper implications of this economic signal, draw comparisons to past recessions, and examine how these dynamics might unfold in the evolving landscape of blockchain and cryptocurrencies.


What an Inverted Yield Curve Means for the Markets—And Why It Matters

Yield curve inversions are often treated as harbingers of economic downturns. This lesson focuses on the prolonged inversion currently gripping the U.S. economy, comparing it to similar events in history—such as the prelude to the Great Depression in 1929 and the 2008 financial crisis. Typically, a yield curve slopes upward, reflecting higher long-term interest rates that signify investor confidence in future growth. When it inverts, long-term rates fall below short-term rates, suggesting investor fears about the economy’s prospects. Historically, inversions like these have preceded severe downturns, and the longer the inversion, the more dire the consequences have been.

Yet, this time around, something seems different. Despite the inversion, stock markets have continued to reach new highs, and unemployment remains low, leading some to believe that perhaps we have outgrown the yield curve’s predictive power. However, skeptics argue that the eerie parallels to past crises cannot be ignored. Could the prolonged inversion indicate a looming crash, or have modern financial policies altered the rules of the game? We’ll also explore how this uncertainty might affect the crypto markets, where Bitcoin and other digital assets could either serve as safe havens or be swept up in broader market turmoil.


Critical Analysis

Strengths of the Yield Curve Argument

  1. Historical Precedence and Predictive Power
    The yield curve has a long history of predicting recessions, dating back to the 1920s. Its track record isn’t perfect, but it has accurately foreshadowed downturns like the Great Depression in 1929 and the 2008 financial crisis. The fact that the current inversion has stretched beyond 530 days—similar to the periods preceding those crises—is a compelling argument that the economy might be in for a rough ride.

    • Example: During the 2006-2007 period, the yield curve inverted for around 530 days, just before the global financial crisis that saw the stock market drop by 60%. Such parallels suggest that, even if the stock market is currently booming, caution is warranted.
  2. Correlation Between Inversion Duration and Recession Severity
    The lesson highlights that longer-lasting yield curve inversions often lead to more severe downturns. For example, the 1929 inversion lasted over 600 days, followed by the devastating Great Depression. Similarly, the 2008 crisis followed an extended inversion period. This correlation provides a clear rationale for why many experts remain cautious despite the apparent market strength.

    • Example: In contrast, the 1989 inversion, which lasted only 175 days, was followed by a milder recession, suggesting that the length of inversion plays a critical role in determining the scale of the economic fallout.
  3. Vulnerability to External Shocks
    Another strong point is the observation that yield curve inversions often leave economies vulnerable to external shocks, such as oil price spikes or market crashes. These shocks have historically served as triggers for recessions when the economy is already weakened by an inversion. This analysis is particularly relevant given today’s global economic uncertainties, including geopolitical tensions and fluctuating commodity prices.

    • Example: The oil shocks of the 1970s and the price surge in 2007 both triggered recessions when the yield curve was inverted. A similar scenario today could spell trouble for markets, even if the initial inversion didn’t cause immediate harm.

Weaknesses and Limitations of the Analysis

  1. Changing Economic Structures
    One potential flaw in drawing parallels to past inversions is the assumption that today’s economy mirrors that of past decades. The world in 2024 is vastly different from 1929 or even 2008, with digital finance, globalization, and unconventional monetary policies playing larger roles. The Federal Reserve’s intervention capabilities and the rise of digital assets add new layers of complexity that might change how inversions impact markets.

    • Counterargument: While historical patterns are useful, the unique nature of the 2024 economy means that past trends may not fully predict future outcomes. For instance, decentralized finance (DeFi) offers alternative financial structures that didn’t exist in past downturns.
  2. The Anomaly of Market Resilience
    The current market resilience, despite the prolonged inversion, challenges the narrative that inversions inevitably lead to downturns. Stock markets have continued to rise, and consumer spending remains strong, raising the possibility that other factors—such as post-pandemic recovery momentum—might be at play. This complicates the argument that the yield curve alone can dictate economic outcomes.

    • Alternative Viewpoint: It’s possible that today’s markets are more driven by investor psychology and speculative trading than by traditional economic fundamentals, making it harder to rely on old signals like yield curves for accurate predictions.
  3. Limited Data Set for Correlations
    The lesson acknowledges that the analysis is based on a small sample size—only about eight significant inversion episodes throughout history. This makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the relationship between inversion duration and market outcomes.

    • Nuance: While patterns are visible, relying on such a limited data set means that outliers or shifts in market structure could alter the expected outcomes. Investors must consider the possibility that this time could be different.

Connections to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain

The concept of yield curve inversions primarily applies to traditional finance, but it offers intriguing insights for the crypto world as well. While yield curves themselves don’t exist in the same way for cryptocurrencies, the broader economic context they indicate can directly influence crypto markets.

Crypto as a Safe Haven?
During times of economic uncertainty, investors often seek safe havens. Traditionally, gold has played this role, but in recent years, Bitcoin has positioned itself as “digital gold.” A prolonged yield curve inversion, signaling a potential recession, might lead some investors to shift capital into Bitcoin, seeking protection from the volatility of traditional markets. However, unlike gold, Bitcoin’s volatility means it’s not a perfect hedge, adding complexity to this narrative.

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Resilience
DeFi platforms offer an alternative to traditional banking systems, allowing users to earn yield through lending protocols and liquidity pools. In a world where traditional interest rates are low or inverted, DeFi could present an attractive option for yield-seeking investors. Platforms like Aave or Compound provide a decentralized space for earning returns, albeit with risks like smart contract vulnerabilities.

Challenges for Crypto During Recessions
Conversely, a deep recession triggered by a prolonged inversion could hurt crypto markets, as liquidity dries up and investors exit riskier assets. This presents a challenge for the sector, which has yet to experience a major recession while fully matured. Understanding this dual nature—both as a potential hedge and a high-risk asset class—is crucial for crypto investors navigating uncertain times.


Broader Implications and Future Outlook

The implications of a prolonged yield curve inversion go beyond immediate market movements. If a recession does follow, it could redefine the landscape of global finance, challenging central banks’ ability to stabilize economies through conventional tools. The continued rise of digital assets and DeFi could offer new pathways for investors seeking returns outside of traditional finance.

The Shift Toward Decentralization
The growing interest in DeFi and blockchain-based finance reflects a desire for financial systems less tied to centralized institutions. Should the traditional banking system come under pressure from a recession, the allure of decentralized, permissionless finance could grow stronger, potentially accelerating the adoption of blockchain technologies.

Potential Impact on Tech Investment
With a recession, investment in high-growth tech sectors might slow down. This could impact blockchain development and the broader cryptocurrency market, which relies heavily on innovation and speculative investment. However, it could also push the industry toward sustainable, utility-focused projects, favoring blockchains with real-world applications over hype-driven tokens.

Predictions for the Next Decade
If history’s lessons hold true, we may see a downturn that reshapes global economic norms. In the crypto world, this could lead to a clearer division between Bitcoin as a store of value and the rise of utility-focused blockchains. The potential integration of blockchain in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) could also transform how yield and interest are perceived in a digital context.


Personal Commentary and Insights

As someone deeply immersed in both traditional finance and the emerging world of crypto, I find the yield curve’s message both sobering and exciting. On one hand, it’s a reminder that economic cycles have not disappeared, despite the optimistic narratives surrounding modern markets. But on the other

hand, it’s thrilling to see how the world of blockchain and crypto might react to these time-tested signals. The potential for Bitcoin to act as a modern safe haven is compelling, though its volatility means it’s not a perfect parallel to gold. I believe that a deeper understanding of both realms—traditional signals like the yield curve and the decentralized possibilities of crypto—can empower investors to navigate the coming storm with a balanced approach.


Conclusion

The prolonged inversion of the yield curve is a powerful signal, suggesting that economic challenges may be on the horizon. While the past may not predict the future with certainty, understanding these historical patterns and their potential impact on markets—both traditional and crypto—can help investors prepare for what’s ahead. As we continue in the Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training program, this lesson serves as a reminder of the value of connecting old-world financial knowledge with new-world digital opportunities. Stay curious, stay prepared, and keep looking for the intersections between these evolving worlds.


Next:

Ready for more insights? Dive into the next lesson in the CFIRE training program to continue building your knowledge and uncover how macroeconomic trends shape the digital asset market. Let’s navigate this complex financial landscape together!

 

LATEST UPDATE: 3 months until it begins

 

 

Understanding Yield Curve Inversions: Implications

In this lesson, we’ll dive deep into the concept of yield curve inversions—a signal that has historically preceded economic downturns. We’ll explore why the yield curve matters in both traditional finance and how it relates to the cryptocurrency ecosystem. With parallels to past financial crises like the Great Depression and the 2008 recession, understanding yield curve dynamics can help investors navigate uncertain times. This lesson is part of the Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training plan, equipping you with insights that tie traditional financial signals to potential movements in the crypto market.


Core Concepts

  1. Yield Curve Inversion

    • Traditional Finance: A yield curve inversion occurs when long-term interest rates fall below short-term rates, signaling a potential economic slowdown. Typically, a healthy economy has higher long-term yields than short-term yields, as investors expect growth and inflation over time.
    • Crypto Context: In the crypto market, a yield curve inversion may parallel periods of increased market uncertainty, where risk aversion rises, and investors shift to stable assets like Bitcoin or stablecoins. Understanding this helps crypto investors anticipate shifts in sentiment.
    • Why It Matters: Recognizing yield curve inversions can prepare investors for potential downturns or opportunities, whether in traditional markets or the crypto space.
  2. Economic Downturn

    • Traditional Finance: A period characterized by reduced economic activity, rising unemployment, and declining market performance. Often follows yield curve inversions.
    • Crypto Context: Economic downturns can lead to liquidity shortages and capital flight from riskier crypto assets, affecting prices across the board. However, downturns can also be periods where crypto, as a hedge, shines—especially assets like Bitcoin.
    • Why It Matters: Being aware of economic cycles can help you time entries and exits in the crypto market, maximizing returns.
  3. Market Melt-Up

    • Traditional Finance: A market condition where asset prices rapidly increase due to an influx of investment, often preceding a downturn. It reflects investor euphoria before reality sets in.
    • Crypto Context: In crypto, a market melt-up could look like sudden parabolic movements in altcoins or Bitcoin, often driven by hype or fear of missing out (FOMO).
    • Why It Matters: Recognizing melt-up patterns can help avoid buying into unsustainable rallies and position better for corrections.
  4. External Economic Shocks

    • Traditional Finance: Events like oil price spikes or geopolitical tensions that can trigger recessions when the economy is vulnerable.
    • Crypto Context: Crypto markets, being sensitive to global risk factors, may react sharply to such shocks, either as a flight to safety (Bitcoin) or risk-off scenarios that affect altcoins.
    • Why It Matters: Understanding these triggers helps in anticipating potential price movements in crypto tied to macroeconomic changes.
  5. Historical Parallels

    • Traditional Finance: Refers to comparing current economic conditions to past events (e.g., the Great Depression or 2008 crisis) for predictions.
    • Crypto Context: Using historical price patterns of Bitcoin or Ethereum alongside traditional parallels can provide insights into potential future movements.
    • Why It Matters: History doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes. By learning from past events, you can better interpret crypto market trends.

Key Sections

1. The Significance of Yield Curve Inversions

  • Key Points:
    • Yield curve inversions have historically predicted recessions.
    • The current inversion has lasted over 530 days, similar to those before major downturns.
    • Previous long inversions (e.g., 1929, 2008) were followed by significant market downturns.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    Yield curve inversions serve as a warning sign. Traditionally, a yield curve slopes upward, reflecting higher long-term interest rates due to anticipated growth. But when investors are nervous about the future, they shift money to long-term bonds, pushing those yields lower. This creates an inversion, a classic signal of a future recession. However, in 2024, despite a prolonged inversion, the stock market has remained buoyant. Does this mean the old rules don’t apply, or are we just delaying the inevitable?
  • Crypto Connection:
    The crypto market, like traditional markets, thrives on investor sentiment. A prolonged yield curve inversion could mean a delayed economic shock, where investors might temporarily flock to Bitcoin as a safe haven, only to see a broad sell-off once recession fears fully materialize.

2. History Repeats: Lessons from Past Inversions

  • Key Points:
    • Comparisons to 1929 and 2008 suggest possible severe downturns.
    • Inversions lasting over 500 days correlate with deep recessions.
    • Shorter inversions, like in 1989, led to milder economic declines.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    History provides valuable insights. The 1929 inversion lasted over 600 days, preceding the Great Depression, while the 2006 inversion signaled the 2008 financial crisis. Shorter inversions, like in 1989, led to milder downturns. The correlation between the length of inversion and recession severity hints at what might be coming. But with each era’s unique circumstances, how much weight should we place on these patterns?
  • Crypto Connection:
    For crypto investors, these historical lessons are crucial. In past downturns, assets like gold soared as safe havens. In a modern context, Bitcoin could play a similar role. However, the nascent and volatile nature of crypto means that investors should brace for higher risks alongside the potential rewards.

3. External Shocks and Their Role in Recessions

  • Key Points:
    • Oil price spikes frequently triggered past recessions.
    • Recessions can also result from market crashes.
    • Each shock leaves the economy more vulnerable.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    External shocks, such as oil spikes or sudden market crashes, often tip economies into recession. The reason? They add stress to an already weakened economic system, pushing it over the edge. This time, the shock might come from geopolitical risks or unexpected economic data, with the world more interconnected than ever.
  • Crypto Connection:
    In the crypto world, the reaction to external shocks can be swift and dramatic. A geopolitical event or traditional market downturn might trigger panic selling across crypto exchanges, yet it could also highlight crypto’s role as a hedge against traditional financial instability.

4. Market Euphoria and the Reality Check

  • Key Points:
    • Stock markets often continue to rise after a yield curve inversion.
    • The 1928 example shows a 98% rally before the crash.
    • This can give a false sense of security to investors.
  • Detailed Explanation:
    After the 1928 yield curve inversion, stocks nearly doubled before crashing in 1929. Similar patterns have played out in other instances. Such rallies create a dangerous complacency among investors, making the eventual downturn all the more painful. Today’s market may be riding a similar wave of optimism—will history catch up once again?
  • Crypto Connection:
    Crypto markets often mirror this euphoria, with altcoins surging during periods of market excitement. Recognizing this can help investors avoid buying into overvalued assets during hype cycles, focusing instead on long-term value and sound projects.

Real-World Applications

  • The Great Depression (1929): A yield curve inversion preceded the crash, similar to today’s scenario. Understanding this helps draw parallels to current crypto market conditions, where a downturn in traditional finance could lead to a flight to digital assets.
  • 2008 Financial Crisis: Crypto didn’t exist during 2008, but if it had, it’s likely that assets like Bitcoin would have attracted attention as alternatives to collapsing banks.

Challenges and Solutions

  • Challenge: Misinterpreting the resilience of markets during inversions.
    • Crypto Insight: While Bitcoin might attract capital as a hedge, it’s still highly volatile. Balancing allocations between crypto and traditional assets can mitigate risk.
  • Challenge: Timing market peaks before a crash.
    • Solution: Using tools like technical analysis and historical patterns to better anticipate market movements, applicable to both stocks and crypto.

Key Takeaways

  1. Yield curve inversions are significant predictors of economic downturns.
  2. The length of an inversion often correlates with the severity of subsequent recessions.
  3. Market euphoria after an inversion can be a dangerous signal.
  4. External shocks, like oil price spikes, can push an economy into recession.
  5. In crypto, Bitcoin might act as a hedge during economic uncertainty.

Discussion Questions and Scenarios

  1. How do yield curve inversions signal potential downturns in both traditional and crypto markets?
  2. Compare the role of gold in 2008 to Bitcoin’s role in today’s economic climate.
  3. What could trigger a recession in 2024, and how might it affect crypto markets?
  4. If a significant market correction occurs, what strategies would you use to protect your crypto investments?
  5. How can investors recognize the difference between a market melt-up and sustainable growth?

Additional Resources and Next Steps

  • Suggested Topics: Economic indicators, technical analysis, and crypto as an inflation hedge.
  • Recommended Resources:
    • “Cryptoassets” by Chris Burniske and Jack Tatar
    • Investopedia’s guide on yield curves and economic indicators.
    • CFIRE’s upcoming lessons on technical analysis and macroeconomic trends.
  • Roadmap: Next, explore how global interest rates impact crypto markets and what to expect from central banks in 2024.

Glossary

  • Yield Curve Inversion: A scenario where short-term interest rates are higher than long-term rates.
  • Market Melt-Up: A rapid increase in asset prices driven by investor enthusiasm.
  • External Economic Shock: Unforeseen events that negatively impact the economy.
  • Bear Market: A period of declining asset prices.
  • Safe Haven: Assets that retain value during economic uncertainty (e.g., gold, Bitcoin).

Continue with the next lesson in the Crypto is FIRE (CFIRE) training program to further your understanding of macroeconomic trends and their impact on the digital asset market. Happy learning!

 

 

Read Video Transcript
The yield curve in the United States has now been inverted for around 530 days.  Between 2006 and 2007, the yield curve was also inverted for around 530 days.  Throughout history, going back to the 1920s, the yield curve has inverted for various periods of time,  all of them eventually leading to recession at one point or another.
 But today, it seems things are different.  We’ve gotten used to the yield curve being inverted. Now, for the last year and a half, the economy  has been doing well. The stock market has been making new all-time highs. The unemployment rate  has stayed low.
 And so this is leading many people to conclude that the yield curve being  inverted for so long with nothing bad happening in the economy means that we are out of the woods. But it could  be just the opposite. In February of 1928, the yield curve inverted and stayed inverted for over  600 days.
 During that period, the economy was booming, the stock market was making new all-time  highs, and the unemployment rate was low. Following that 600-day yield curve inversion, the U.S. economy experienced one of the  most prolonged and difficult economic downturn in modern financial history. Now, of course,  the U.S. economy is very different today in 2024 to what it was like in 1929.
 But if we look at  what happened in 2006, the yield curve stayed inverted for around 530 days. And throughout  this period, the economy was doing well, the stock market was  making new highs, and the unemployment rate was low. But this prolonged yield curve inversion  was also then followed by one of the largest economic downturns since the Great Depression,  with the stock market dropping by a staggering 60%.
 On the other hand, if we rewind to the 1989  yield curve inversion, that was a much shorter inversion. In total, the yield  curve was only inverted for around 175 days, which is actually one of the shortest periods of time in  history where the yield curve was inverted. And although that did also eventually lead to a  recession in 1990, this was one of the shallowest downturns we’ve seen in modern financial history.
 So at a first glance, it does seem that the longer  the yield curve stays inverted, the more serious the economic downturn that follows. And when the  yield curve is inverted for less time, it leads to less serious economic downturns and shallower  bear markets.
 The theory being that when the yield curve is inverted, it doesn’t necessarily  trigger an economic downturn straight away, but it gradually weakens the economy. And the longer it stays inverted, the more vulnerable the economy becomes  to some kind of an external shock that can trigger a recession. In many cases throughout history,  that shock comes from oil.
 That was actually the case in 2007, where oil prices spiked and that  triggered a recession. It happened in 2001, where oil prices spiked and that triggered a recession. It happened in 2001 where oil prices  spiked and that triggered a recession. It also triggered the recession in 1989, in the 1980s,  and in the 1970s. All of these oil shocks were followed by recessions.
 The only recession that  wasn’t triggered by an oil shock was actually in 2020 that was triggered by the pandemic.  Now, another type of shock that can trigger a recession could be a market crash, like the Black Tuesday crash that occurred in 1929, that many people believe was  the initial catalyst for the Great Depression that followed. In 1987, we saw a similar flash crash.
 Many people thought the price action on the stock market looked very similar to what happened in the  Great Depression, where a euphoric melt-up eventually led to a 30% drop in the market. But the crash in 1987 never led to a Great Depression like in the  1930s.
 The big difference, of course, is that the yield curve had never been inverted in 1987,  whereas it had been inverted for over 600 days when the crash occurred in 1929.  Fast forward to today’s market melt up, if stocks also head  into a blow off top today, similar to 1987 and 1929, which we’ve already shown is what seems to  be happening today, it could be concerning given that the yield curve has been inverted for the  same amount of time as it was before 2008.
 So is there any truth to this theory? You can see here  I’ve labeled the number of days where  the yield curve was inverted for every single episode in history. The worst ones being in 1929,  2008, and 1974. All of them with the yield curve inverted for over 500 days. And the shortest yield  curve inversions being 1966, 2020, and 1989, where the yield curve stayed inverted for less than 200 days.
 In all of these cases, these episodes happen to have been followed by the shallowest and shortest  bear markets in history. When we plot this on a graph of the number of inverted days against the  drawdowns that the stock market experienced following each inversion, we do see that there  is a correlation between the number of days where the yield curve was inverted with the stock market drawdown. This is the 1929 episode.
 This is the 2008 episode, 1974. This is 1969, 1989, and 2020 right here. Now, of course, there are only  eight episodes to look at, and that is not enough data to really have 100% confidence in any type of trend. The  yield curve today has been inverted for 540 days, which puts us right around the 1974 and 2008  episodes.
 This is one of the key reasons why we are expecting the next bear market to be quite  severe. Now, that’s just our way of looking at how the yield curve is going to impact the stock market in the future.  But in the here and now, how high can the stock market go while the yield curve stays inverted?  In 2019, for example, the yield curve inverted in June and the stock market continued to rise another 25% for 258 days before the big peak that was made in February of 2020.
 In July of 2006,  the yield curve inverted and the stock market also rose another 25%, this time for over 600 days  before the stock market peaked in October of 2007. Rewind to 1989 and the stock market rose  29% following the yield curve inversion for 500 days. The most  exceptional example is actually January of 1928, where the yield curve inverted and the stock  market continued to rally 98% until August of 1929.
 So the stock market almost doubled in price  over the course of two years before finally making its peak.  All of these episodes show us that the stock market rally can continue,  despite the yield curve being an ominous signal for investors.  In terms of how long that can go, the maximum amount of time that we’ve seen the stock market  rally after an inversion was in 2007 for 657 days.
 after an inversion, was in 2007 for 657 days. If the market were to also rally for 657 days following the 2022 yield curve inversion, that would mean there’s another 146 days left,  which would take us to August of 2024. Although we think there’s the possibility of short-term  downside, this is a scenario that we think is quite plausible.
 Now, it could be that we are dead wrong about a big correction coming following the yield curve inversion or dead wrong  about the fact that a final rally is coming before that happens. We thought recession risks were  quite elevated in February of 2023. We closed our long bets on consumer discretionary and tech  stocks that are now up around 45% since we closed those positions.  Now we’ve had quite a few successful trades as well.
 We made a few crypto bets that went up by  around 100%. We’ve been holding precious metals and gold miners that have performed incredibly  well over the last year. If you want to take a look at our trades, go to gameoftrades.net  and you can test our service out completely for free.
 

3 More Months Until it Begins…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy53X-r59JM
 The yield curve has just steepened by a full percentage point coming out of an inversion.  The last time this happened was in 2020 during the COVID-19 recession.  Before that, it was towards the end of 2007 heading into the great financial crisis.  And before that, it was in 2001 heading into the dot-com bust.
 Every single time the yield curve has done this, it was either during a recession or  right before recession began.  And that includes the Great Depression where the yield curve steepened by a full percentage point  in October of 1929, the very month that marks the beginning of the Great Depression.
 Yes, yes,  Peter, we’ve heard all of this before. When the yield curve steepens, that’s when the recession  is meant to begin. So then where on earth is the recession today? GDP growth in the United States  is still trending at a healthy 2%. According to government data, the job market is still  relatively strong.
 And in case you don’t trust the government data, then just look at the stock  market. It’s at all-time highs. Not really things you would typically associate with a recession,  right? Maybe this incredible indicator, the yield curve that was discovered  by Mr. Campbell Harvey in the 1980s is finally dead. Maybe it’s time to say goodbye to the yield  curve’s flawless track record. Let’s try and figure out if we’re there yet.
 First, a very brief  rundown on what the yield curve is meant to be and why a steepening is meant to coincide with  a recession. The yield curve takes a longer term  bond yields, like the one you get on a 10 year treasury bond and shorter term bond yields,  like the one you get on a two year treasury bond. And it looks at the difference between them.
 This  is what it looks like. This is the yield on a 10 year note minus the one on a two year note. Now,  most of the time you have the 10 year yield that is higher than the two year yield. So the yield  curve is above zero, but sometimes the 10 yearyear yield becomes lower than the two-year yield.
 And that’s what you call a  yield curve inversion. Now, this usually happens because the Federal Reserve has been raising its  interest rate. They control shorter term yield. And so they can deliberately make it so that the  yield curve inverts. This is what they call restrictive policy, something you may have  heard them say before. Now, for reasons I won’t get into in this video, restrictive policy, something you may have heard them say before.
 Now, for reasons  I won’t get into in this video, restrictive policy isn’t great for the economy. It makes banks in the  United States stop lending, and every single time that leads to a recession. And that’s where the  yield curve steepening comes in. It’s when the yield curve is coming out of an inversion. And  that happens when the Federal Reserve begins to cut interest rates because the economy is weakening and likely heading into a downturn. So now you’re all caught up.
 Let’s come back to our question, why on earth has a recession not yet started today despite  the yield curve steepening? Well, when we look at where the yield curve is at the very beginning of  the last four recessions, it’s kind of a little bit different every time.
 For example, in 1989 and 2020, the recession  started when the yield curve was at 0.1%. In 2001, the recession started when the yield curve was at  0.5%. And in 2007, the recession only began when the yield curve was at 1%. So this right here is  the hot zone where recessions typically begin. Today, the yield curve is in the hot zone for sure,  but we can’t completely invalidate the yield curve as a recession indicator.
 Because if you had set  that in July of 2007, when the yield curve was at exactly the same spot as it is today,  you would have been painfully wrong because the recession didn’t begin until the yield curve had  steepened all the way up to 1%.
 If we assume that the same thing is going to happen again this time around, the yield curve could continue to steepen until January of 2025 before  the recession actually starts. Now, if the yield curve steepens past this level over the next year  and we still haven’t entered a recession, that’s when we can say that the yield curve’s validity  as a recession indicator really comes into question. But this is a very mechanical way  of looking at the yield curve.
 We’re merely just observing the levels and comparing the different  episodes we have throughout history. There is another way that we can assess whether or not  the yield curve is going to be correct this time around. And that is by looking at the US job  market, or more specifically, initial jobless claims. So the number of people that are filing  for unemployment every week.
 If this chart looks familiar, that’s because it is.  It’s almost the exact reflection of the yield curve itself.  And that’s been the case going back all the way to the 1960s.  90% of the time, the yield curve is following the exact same path as initial jobless claims.  Why does this happen?  You can go ask the Fed.
 We’re just looking  at the end result here. Now, you may have noticed that initial jobless claims recently have been  particularly strong despite the fact that the yield curve is steepening. So they haven’t really  been going in the same direction.
 Now, this is unusual behavior because most of the time when  a steepening occurs heading into a recession, you tend to see initial jobless claims moving  higher and confirming what is happening in the yield curve. Now, we have two potential scenarios  here. Scenario A, initial jobless claims never end up moving higher, and the yield curve actually  ends up reinverting, which would delay the timeline of the recession.
 This happened briefly  in 1999 when the yield curve steepened, but initial jobless claims continued to trend lower.  It also happened very briefly in 2006. The yield curve steepened, but the job market remained  strong, and so the yield curve reinverted. In both of these cases, the recession didn’t play  out immediately, but a couple of years later.
 Now, in scenario B, initial jobless claims actually  begin to move higher over the next few months and catch up to the yield curve. Now, that’s actually  exactly what happened in 2007. The yield curve was steepening even though the job market was still  quite strong. The steepening continued and eventually initial jobless claims began to  trend higher, marking the beginning of the recession.
 So which one is it going to be,  scenario A or scenario B? Well, there are many experts out there that argue that the economy  is nowhere near a recession  because of the extreme levels of government spending.  Indeed, when we look at U.S. government spending, it has been very elevated recently,  certainly some of the most aggressive spending that we’ve seen over the last decade.
 But if we zoom out a little bit, we see that the U.S. government was also spending a lot  heading into the 2008 recession, perhaps less than today, but still. It didn’t do much  to stop the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression from occurring. So that puts  a dent in the idea that government spending alone can stop a recession from occurring.
 At Bravo’s research, we believe that we’re in the process of seeing scenario B playing out,  meaning that we expect initial jobless claims to begin trending higher, catching up to the signal from the yield curve, and for this to coincide with the beginning of  the next recession.
 And if we’re following a similar path to what happened in 2007,  that could be about three months from now. Now, what does that all mean for the US stock market  that’s breaking out to all-time highs? You do tend to see the stock market fall heading in the months before recessions  occur.
 That happened in 2000, in the couple of months before the 2007 recession, and going back  further in history, we also saw the stock market peak well in advance of the 1974 and 1980  recessions. This is why most investors that believe we’re very close to a recession are  turning bearish right now.
 After all, with only a few months left before the recession starts, stocks should be declining, right? Well, history also shows that the stock  market can sometimes continue to rise until the very last moment. That happened in July of 1990,  in February of 1980, and it also happened in September of 1929. This is why we’re staying  extremely flexible with our equity strategy today,  not just because we want to pick up nickels in front of the steamroller, but because we’re also  aware we could be wrong about a recession occurring in the next few months.