Curriculum
Course: Money
Login

Curriculum

Money

Video lesson

Network State: Your Own Country

Navigating the Concept of Network States

Future of Governance: The Network State

In a world dominated by the complexities of modern governance and the rapidly evolving digital landscape, have you ever wondered what truly defines a country? The question is not just existential; it is becoming increasingly relevant. Balaji Srinivasan’s concept of the “network state” challenges traditional notions of nationhood and hints at a future where new countries could emerge from the digital ether. Imagine a community united not by geography, but through shared values and goals, crowdfunded from across the world—this could be the next frontier of political and social innovation.

From this lesson, you will gain insights that empower you to contemplate the intricacies of governance in the digital age and explore how emerging concepts can be integrated into your understanding of the crypto ecosystem. Key takeaways include:

  • Understanding the fundamental differences between nations and states.
  • Engaging with the idea of moral innovation as the basis for community-building.
  • Exploring the potential for decentralized governance models in conjunction with cryptocurrencies.

Overview: The Network State Revolution

Srinivasan’s notion of network states fundamentally reshapes our understanding of governance and community. He posits that traditional nation-states are not the only way to develop cohesive societies; rather, a network state is an online community with shared moral premises, capable of collective action. Such communities can eventually gain territory and, potentially, diplomatic recognition.

Key features of a network state include:

  • Community-focused identity over territorial claims.
  • An integrated cryptocurrency to support economic systems.
  • A consensual government framework defined by social contracts.

These characteristics challenge the conventional wisdom surrounding nationhood, suggesting that the road ahead may not depend on existing structures but on the innovative ideas that can unite communities in the digital space.

Steps to Creating a Network State – Starting Your Own New Digital Country

  1. Build a Community: Start with an engaged online community based on shared values and goals.
  2. Develop a Moral Premise: Define a moral innovation that will serve as the foundation for your community identity.
  3. Crowdfund Territory: Assemble resources to acquire land or physical spaces that will serve as the basis for your network state.
  4. Establish Governance: Develop a governance structure based on social contracts and mutual agreements.
  5. Enhance Citizen Engagement: Implement integrated cryptocurrencies and a comprehensive service model to foster citizen participation and commitment.
  6. Seek Diplomatic Recognition: Aim to gain recognition from existing states or international bodies based on community success metrics.

Deeper Analysis: The Power of the Network State Concept

The network state concept is a bold reimagining of governance rooted in communal identity and moral innovation. Here are a few compelling points made by Srinivasan that merit deeper exploration:

  1. Community First, Territory Later: By prioritizing community over geographic boundaries, network states present an innovative way to address contemporary issues of citizenship and belonging. This helps overcome the rigid structures of traditional nation-states that often exclude marginalized groups. For example, the Kurdish people maintain a strong national identity without a recognized state, illustrating that collective identity can exist without formal territorial claims.

  2. Moral Innovation as a Cornerstone: Every network state aims to reform or improve on specific axes through moral innovation. This idea is akin to the ethos behind startups focused on a single problem. A compelling example is the burgeoning health communities that are focused on wellness, exemplifying how dedicated communities can drive significant change—not just at the personal level, but also in influencing broader societal norms.

  3. Digital Capital and Resilience: The decentralization of network states enables enhanced resilience against external threats. This reflects the need for communities to operate in a way similar to decentralized networks like Bitcoin. The idea that digital territories can be spread across various dimensions rather than confined to one nation complicates the dynamic of geopolitical power.

  4. Economic Viability: Network states are financially viable through their modeled revenue systems, akin to the subscription-based approach in software as a service. By fostering high engagement and affinity, they could potentially achieve higher profitability per user than current social networks.

Reimagining Nations: The Network State Concept Explained

The exploration of network states naturally aligns with the principles underpinning blockchain technology. In essence, as network states leverage the decentralized framework of the internet, they often incorporate integrated cryptocurrencies to facilitate community interaction and economic transactions.

  1. Decentralization: Just like blockchain, network states are built on the concept of decentralization, allowing for autonomy without centralized governance from traditional nation-states, much like how decentralized finance (DeFi) operates without intermediaries.

  2. Cryptocurrency as a Binding Force: The integration of cryptocurrencies in network states can foster economic interactions among community members, paving the way for specific economic models that are tailored around shared values. This mirrors existing projects in the cryptocurrency space where coins are designed for specific communities, such as food co-ops and social impact initiatives.

  3. Innovative Governance: Network states can embody the principles seen within DeFi, such as community-driven governance models. Members may have votes proportional to their contributions or holdings, promoting a cooperative approach to decision-making.

From Startups to States: Building Your Own Network Nation

The implications of the network state phenomenon extend far beyond community organization; they signal a potential paradigm shift in governance. As individuals increasingly turn to online communities for connection and support, might we see the emergence of new governance forms that prioritize personal and communal values over traditional nation-state considerations?

With the increasing complexity of global issues—climate change, inequality, and digital privacy—the flexibility inherent in network states could encourage innovative solutions never before seen in conventional governance structures. Moreover, as digital nomadism becomes more prevalent, these decentralized structures could support individuals seeking alternative lifestyles.

In a world where borders are becoming less relevant to personal identity, might we also anticipate the rise of diplomatic relationships predicated on shared ideals rather than geographical confines? Future developments like digital passports issued by network states could redefine how people navigate citizenship and belonging, ushering in a new era of global connections.

Personal Commentary and Insights

As I reflect on the concept of network states, I am struck by the parallels to the entrepreneurial spirit that fuels much of our digital economy today. The very idea that communities can start from nothing and grow into complex networks challenges our traditional views about governance and identity.

Balaji Srinivasan’s vision of society as a service resonates with me—as we craft our digital landscapes, the notion of communities being able to flourish outside of rigid governmental structures is not just appealing but necessary for innovation in the 21st century. I can’t help but wonder what my own form of moral innovation might look like and how it could influence the communities I inhabit.

Conclusion

The network state concept provokes thoughtful introspection into what it means to belong to a community and how we define governance in the modern world. In embracing this idea, one can envision a future characterized by decentralized structures that operate not just within the framework of physical borders, but through shared values and collective aspirations.

As we venture forth, consider how these ideas may intersect with the potential of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies. The transformative potential of these ideas could very well shape the next evolution in governance and community building, and the time to explore these innovations is now.


Quotes:

  1. “A network state is a social network with a moral innovation, a sense of national consciousness, a recognized founder…”

  2. “Balaji gives a compelling argument here that the US is not a nation-state but rather a binational republic…”

  3. “You basically implement like keto kosher at the border… it changes every single meal and every single grocery store and every restaurant within these borders.”

 

 

 

Network States: Countries in the Modern Era

In the rapidly evolving landscape of society and economics, a profound question has emerged: What constitutes a country? Historically, nations have been bound by geography, culture, and governance. However, with the advent of digital communities and decentralized networks, we stand on the cusp of potentially reshaping these traditional notions. Here, we delve into the intriguing concept of network states as proposed by Balaji Srinivasan—a revolutionary idea that intertwines the fabric of digital communities with political and economic dynamics, and how this might also resonate within the ever-growing cryptocurrency space.

Core Concepts

To ensure a firm grasp of this avant-garde topic, it’s essential to explore some key terms that bridge traditional finance and the world of cryptocurrencies:

  1. Network State:

    • Traditional Finance: A political entity or nation defined by territorial boundaries and governance structures.
    • Crypto Context: An online community united by a shared moral premise, capable of crowdfunding physical territories and aspiring for diplomatic recognition, mirroring decentralized networks like cryptocurrencies.
  2. Moral Innovation:

    • Traditional Finance: The evolution of ethical frameworks guiding financial decisions and governance.
    • Crypto Context: The principle driving network states to prioritize shared values over traditional statehood, which can lead to the development of unique economic systems—much like cryptocurrencies defining their own governance structures.
  3. Diplomatic Recognition:

    • Traditional Finance: Official acknowledgment from existing states, allowing for international relations and trade.
    • Crypto Context: As cryptocurrencies gain legitimacy, so too could network states find their footing on the global stage through similar recognition processes, potentially reshaping economic alliances.
  4. Crowdfunded Territory:

    • Traditional Finance: Land acquisition through state-sponsored initiatives or private transactions.
    • Crypto Context: The concept of pooling resources within a virtual community to secure physical land, parallel to ICOs where stakeholders fund a project in exchange for tokens.
  5. Social Contract:

    • Traditional Finance: An implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits.
    • Crypto Context: In a network state, this contract emphasizes shared values and goals, underpinning governance through community-endorsed protocols, similar to how decentralized governance operates in some blockchain projects.
  6. Decentralization:

    • Traditional Finance: The distribution of power away from a central authority, prevalent in democratic governance.
    • Crypto Context: Vital to cryptocurrencies and blockchain, decentralization also applies to network states as they seek to establish identity and governance beyond traditional borders.
  7. Society as a Service:

    • Traditional Finance: Services provided by a state to manage the welfare of its citizens.
    • Crypto Context: A network state might offer similar services but with a more flexible and community-driven approach, akin to decentralized finance (DeFi) models.

Understanding these concepts is not only pivotal for grasping the underpinnings of network states but equally essential for anyone looking to navigate the interconnected world of cryptocurrencies.

Key Steps in Building a Network State

Building a network state is a multifaceted endeavor that can be organized into several crucial sections:

1. Forming an Online Community

  • Key Points:
    • Establish a shared moral premise.
    • Foster communal bonds through shared values.
  • Explanation: The inception of a network state begins with an online community united by collective aspirations. Unlike traditional nations, these communities thrive on shared moral frameworks, where the strength of social ties can inspire action and commitment.

2. Crowdfunding Land

  • Key Points:
    • Gathering resources to secure territories.
    • Utilizing decentralized financing methods.
  • Explanation: As networks grow, so does the need for physical presence. Crowdfunding land allows groups to secure territories globally, much like how early bitcoin investors funded projects by pooling resources.

3. Establishing Governance

  • Key Points:
    • Develop a consensual government.
    • Commit to a social contract.
  • Explanation: The governance structure of a network state hinges on agreements made by its members. This can be analogous to decentralized protocols where users agree on rules set forth by the community.

4. Gaining Diplomatic Recognition

  • Key Points:
    • Achieving acknowledgment from existing states.
    • Demonstrating legitimacy through metrics (population, income).
  • Explanation: The challenge of diplomatic recognition parallels the legitimacy cryptocurrencies seek from traditional financial systems. Much like how certain cryptocurrencies are striving for regulatory acceptance, nascent network states must show viability and traction to garner international acknowledgment.

5. Creating Economic Structures

  • Key Points:
    • Develop revenue models, including taxes.
    • Ensure sustainable funding through community participation.
  • Explanation: A successful network state requires effective economic models, much like how certain cryptocurrencies have established systems of value creation to ensure longevity and stability.

6. Fostering Community Affinity

  • Key Points:
    • Promote shared identity and culture.
    • Develop a sense of belonging and participation.
  • Explanation: Just as cryptocurrencies rely on strong community engagement, successful network states will hinge upon fostering deep communal ties among their members to cultivate loyalty and purpose.

A Blockchain Perspective

Crypto Connection for Each Section:

  • Community Formation: Think of blockchain projects where user communities form around shared values and governance structures—DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) epitomize this principle, promoting power redistribution.

  • Crowdfunding Land: Projects like Bitland are pioneering efforts in land titling using blockchain, mirroring network state aspirations in securing decentralized territories.

  • Governance: Platforms like MakerDAO illustrate how decentralized finance can forge community-led governance, akin to what network states aspire towards.

  • Diplomatic Recognition: The rise of cryptocurrencies as legitimate financial systems challenges traditional diplomacy, hinting at a potential future where digital states gain global acknowledgment.

  • Economic Structures: The economic models of cryptocurrencies provide a framework for network states to innovate their dissociated revenue mechanisms, using community-driven economics.

  • Community Affinity: Platforms like Ethereum exhibit community ownership through governance tokens, promoting higher engagement similar to what network states strive for.

Examples

The lesson draws from existing methodologies. For instance, visual aids such as graphs showing the rise in the number of UN member states can provide relatable analogies to the emerging landscape of digital currencies, which have seen exponential growth. The way traditional states have navigated recognition might parallel the validation efforts cryptocurrencies undergo to shift perceptions.

Hypothetical examples can immerse you further in understanding:

  1. Imagine a network state focusing on a cybernetic economy where transactions are exclusively in Bitcoin, revolutionizing participation within the community.
  2. A network state might prioritize technological education, creating a globally competitive workforce, similar to how nations invest in STEM initiatives.
  3. Envision a decentralized health-care network state where medical records are stored on-chain, providing efficiency and security—all while challenging how traditional health systems operate.

Real-World Applications

The historical context of state-building paired with the rise of cryptocurrencies illustrates the shifting paradigms of governance and economics. Traditional countries faced numerous challenges before diplomatic recognition, much like how cryptocurrencies are seeking regulatory acceptance today.

Take the case of small nations such as Nauru or Tuvalu, which have navigated the complexities of global recognition with minimal populations; similarly, a network state could emerge from groundbreaking digital communities—not unlike the rise of Ethereum with its innovative approaches to governance and collaboration.

Cause and Effect Relationships

In navigating the path towards recognition as a network state, a notable cause-effect relationship emerges: strong community engagement directly correlates with the effectiveness of governance structures. As evident in cryptocurrency, communities that participate actively not only enhance protocol stability but also attract broader financial legitimacy.

Challenges and Solutions

The pathway to constructing a network state isn’t devoid of obstacles. Challenges include gaining recognition and establishing legitimacy. These challenges resonate within crypto spaces where new tokens vie for visibility. However, unique solutions such as leveraging decentralized technologies can facilitate community assertion and build resilience against conventional scrutiny.

Misconceptions may arise around the feasibility of network states; however, recognizing the rise of cryptocurrencies can quell these doubts. What was once deemed impossible became reality through innovation; similarly, the road to new nations might be more plausible than one thinks.

Key Takeaways

  1. Redefining Nationhood: The boundaries of nation-states are changing, allowing for new forms of governance.
  2. Collective Identity: Community and shared moral values form the bedrock of potential network states.
  3. Decentralization Opportunities: Decentralized principles can guide the formation of new entities in ways traditional systems cannot.
  4. Economic Models: Network states can innovate in taxation and revenue generation, similar to how cryptocurrencies operate.
  5. Initial Stakeholders: Engaged community members lay the groundwork for achieving diplomatic recognition.
  6. Cultural Innovation: Just as Bitcoin fosters community engagement, network states thrive on cultural resonances.
  7. Iterative Improvements: Network states are akin to startups, evolving by iterating based on community feedback.

As a beginner in the crypto ecosystem, applying these insights can empower your understanding of the emerging digital landscape, positioning you to engage meaningfully in future discussions regarding political and economic transformations.

Discussion Questions and Scenarios

  1. How does the definition of a country evolve when viewed through the lens of digital communities?
  2. In what ways can moral innovations born from network states influence existing societal structures?
  3. Compare the mechanisms of gaining recognition for a network state versus those utilized by new cryptocurrencies.
  4. What similarities do you observe between traditional startups and network states in their inception and growth?
  5. How might a network state manage community dissent or disagreements as compared to traditional governance models?
  6. Consider the implications of creating a digital currency exclusive to a network state. How does this compare to leading cryptocurrencies?
  7. Discuss the feasibility of your own moral innovation—what would it look like, and who would it serve within a network state framework?

Glossary

  • Network State: A community-first approach to governance without the confines of traditional borders, supported by digital frameworks.
  • Moral Innovation: A fundamental ethical shift that drives community values and norms within a network state structure.
  • Crowdfunded Territory: The act of pooling resources within a community to acquire land or resources for a network state.
  • Social Contract: An agreement among members within a network state that defines governance principles and responsibilities.
  • Diplomatic Recognition: The acknowledgment by other states of the legitimacy and sovereignty of a network state.
  • Decentralization: The dispersion of authority away from a central figure, crucial for both cryptocurrencies and network states.
  • Society as a Service: An evolving governance model proposing that communities can provide organized societal frameworks akin to service-based businesses.

Continue to Next Lesson

As you reflect upon the fascinating possibilities of network states and their role in our digital future, the journey does not end here. Your next step in this Crypto Is FIRE (CFIRE) training program awaits—let’s dive deeper into how the merging of technology and finance shapes our world!

 

Read Video Transcript
We Can Now START New COUNTRIES And We Should! – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wE4ERvSqUeA
Transcript:
 In the last decade a question emerged that we didn’t have to think about for a long  time.  What is money?  A concept so deeply intertwined in our daily life that we find it hard to define what it  means.  What makes a currency a currency and is there a way to create new currencies?  During this decade we might ask another one of these society changing questions.
 What is a country and can we create new ones?  After watching this video you will not only have a lot of food for thought,  you might actually think that starting a country is entirely possible and that you can do so.  We are talking about the concept of the network state, an idea by Balaji Srinivasan.
 A network state is a highly aligned online community with a capacity for collective action  that crowdfunds territory around the world and eventually gains diplomatic recognition from pre-existing states.  Before we get deeper into what a network state is, how to get there, why we should do it  in the first place and even building our own version of a network state, I want to introduce  Balaji.
 I know that he’s not very fond of credentialism even though he has a lot of credentials to  his name, so here are some of Silicon Valley’s big players describing the creator of the network  state concept.  Balaji has the highest rate of output per minute of good new ideas of anybody I’ve  ever met.  Balaji is a visionary and one of the most original thinkers of our time.
 Many have had the experience of hearing him say something, thinking it was crazy and then  a year or two later realizing Balaji was right.  I think Balaji will be right about the network state.  So I got really excited and honestly quite proud when his team reached out to me last  year saying I’ve been identified as someone they would like to have as an attendee of  a Balaji lecture series about the network state.
 To better understand the characteristics of a network state, we first need to look at  nation states.  Nation state.  Nation and state.  We use them collectively, but they are two  distinct ideas.  A nation is not some artificial border we draw on a map.  Nation is about community, not territory.  The word comes from the same root as natality, which means something like from common birth.
 A nation is a community of people formed on the basis of a combination of shared features,  such as language, history, ethnicity, culture  and or society.  A state on the other hand is the system of law and government to manage the affairs of  a nation.  This has three implications.  The nation comes before the state.
 You don’t need any land to define as a nation and you can have a nation without a state  or territory, like the Kurds or Catalonians.  The same nation can have various states over time.  Network states build upon these implications. They are community first and land and laws last.  However, and this is important, land and law does eventually come.
 They start with an online  community, with culture, and most importantly with an implicit agreement, a shared moral premise.  More on this in a second. This is where things get really interesting when it comes to political  reform and improving society.  This bottom-up approach has worked out extremely well in all sorts of areas, most things that  are big today started from humble beginnings.
 Think about Steve Jobs in Wozniak building Apple from a garage or basement, like so many  early stage companies.  Think about Facebook, which went from one user to three billion users,  which is larger than any population of any country.  Think about Bitcoin, from literally zero  to 10,000 Bitcoin for pizza to a trillion dollar asset.
 So we start new companies, we start new communities,  we recently started new currencies,  and we can also start new countries.  Let’s get into a more precise definition  or rather a feature set.  A network state is a social network with a moral innovation, a sense of national consciousness,  a recognized founder, a capacity for collective action, an in-person level of civility, an  integrated cryptocurrency, a consensual government limited by a social contract, an archipelago  of crowdfunded physical territories, a virtual capital, an on-chain census that
 proves a large enough population, income and real estate footprint to attain a measure  of diplomatic recognition.  The term nation is replaced with the term network, because the nation is the network  that forms online that is defined by a shared moral premise.  This moral premise is what unites the nation and creates the national consciousness, not  origin, language or ethnicity.
 By the way, Balaji gives a compelling argument here that the US is not a nation state but rather  a binational republic with red and blue nations underneath. However, back to the moral innovation.  The goal of a network state is to improve or at least change the status quo on one axis.  I let Balaji run you through an example of what that means.
 It’s very similar to a startup, right? A startup is all about focus. One thing you’re changing.  Let me give a second example of the one commandment. The moral premise, carbs bad,  that moral innovation. You basically implement like keto kosher at the border. You have,  you intradite it, you take it seriously, okay? And if you really seriously take sugar and carbs bad,  and you take that to the nth power,  it changes everything on the store shelves.
 Like every single grocery store, there’s no cookies.  There’s also no high fructose corn syrup stuff.  A lot of the prepared stuff, a lot of that stuff goes away.  It changes every restaurant.  They can no longer add syrups and things to their food  to make it tastier.  That alone is a lot, right?  Changing every single meal and every single grocery store and every restaurant within these borders  is a pretty big deal.
 You take the carb-free zone, you start iterating it, okay? After people lose  30 pounds, then what happens? Maybe then everybody gets equipped with a CGM, continuous glucose  monitor, right? Or you start rolling out other quantified self stuff to the community. That  moral innovation unlocks another moral innovation and another, and you start rolling out other quantified self stuff to the community. That moral innovation unlocks another moral innovation and another and you start going from one commandment to 1.
5 and  you start actually building it out. Balaji calls it society as a service, like software as a service  which you can subscribe to and unsubscribe from. Everyone can leave whenever they want, it’s not  a cult. And I guess this is rooted in common sense, you don’t let everyone into your house  but whoever is in your house may leave at any time.
 So we got the social network, the moral innovation and the national consciousness.  This is all fun and cute, but where are we on the map?  Territory matters.  This is what it could look like when a network state develops.  As you can see, the crowdfunding of land does not happen in one specific place, but all  over the world.
 A decentralized country, similar to how Google has offices around the globe, or the Bitcoin  network of nodes, or even existing countries which clearly don’t have to be one joint  mass of land.  I mean, look at places like Indonesia, which consists of 17,000 islands.  This level of decentralization of a network state also helps resilience.
 It’s somewhat hard to nuke a worldwide archipelago with a capital in the cloud.  But sure, cool, let’s say all of this works, we crowdfunded some territory, what now?  We are still definitely not part of the member states of the United Nations.  Diplomatic recognition at first seems like the most difficult piece of the network state  puzzle.
 But maybe it isn’t.  When you think about it, most countries are small. Some of them are really small. The majority of UN members have less than  10 million citizens, 20% have a population of less than a million people and 10 countries have less  than 100,000 citizens. Building a community of that size is not impossible.
 So scale is certainly  not the constraint when it comes to diplomatic recognition.  There is also not a fixed number of nations that are part of the UN. As you can see, the amount of  memberships has clearly trended upwards over time. Just as we’ve seen the numbers of cryptocurrencies  going completely vertical over the last decade, we might see new decentralized countries that  receive diplomatic recognition in the future.
 Balaji’s assumption, which has already proven  right to some degree, is that sufficient traction in the cloud or digitally can give you diplomatic  recognition on the land. So similar to how Bitcoin is now being compared to fiat currencies,  we could have network states being compared to other nation states, because the KPIs are the  same. Look at the dashboard. We track population, income and territory in square meters.
 Network  states can also be profitable through something like taxes.  Again, society as a service.  That’s what you pay for as a citizen.  Nation states can have an extremely high annual revenue per user compared to social networks  which are massive in scale but have a comparatively low revenue per user.  The question is if it’s possible to build a somewhat more niche community with diplomatic  recognition and a way higher affinity than a big mainstream social network to justify  tax-like revenues.
 Then your network state achieves profitability.  This affinity towards the community or network or nation and its moral innovation is key,  and Balaji makes it very clear how applications and communities on the internet increase in  this regard.  In the 1990s there were just page visits, in the 2000s daily active users, so you register  and stick with a platform like Facebook.
 In the 2010s you include some level of ownership, now holding a digital asset like bitcoin is  part of the game, so they are even more involved.  And in the 2020s we might level up the affinity again through digital passports issued by  your network state.  So while network states can be profitable, it’s not really about making money.
 It’s about making  freedom and making more opportunities to reform politics. Very few people can become the president  of the United States. However, everyone can start a startup. What if more people start communities,  lead them well, and these communities turn into new countries over time.  While certainly ambitious, you have to admit this at least sounds very interesting.
 A bottom-up competition with lots of space for experiments to select the winners over  time that reform societies.  I was also thinking about what my moral innovation would look like.  Maybe something like Bitcoin Good, fostering a Bitcoin-circular economy, everyone runs  a node, attractive opportunities for Bitcoin companies, etc.
 This place arguably  already exists though. Other ones would be entrepreneurship important, reading  good or changing how public education works. Let me know about your moral  innovation. It’s all about starting to think of yourself and your community as  a new country.
 Existing countries are also artificial collective hallucinations  and social conventions,  that’s all there is to it. The network state is an idea that people will laugh at, I have  no doubt about that. But honestly, we memed a new form of money into being within just a decade,  why not new countries? And speaking of countries and decentralization,  something that goes hand in hand with the network state is digital nomadism.
 I’ve been traveling the world for a while now, making this video from France actually,  so to learn the pros and cons of the digital nomad lifestyle and learning about my story,  check out this video next!